<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer on CNN</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: megapotamus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-4331</link>
		<dc:creator>megapotamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 02:02:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/#comment-4331</guid>
		<description>Well, we shall see. The ties between Saddam and AQ/Islamoterror are many, sound and various. It is quite mysterious why the WH has not been on that facet but, hey, they have strategery in mind, I hope. A push-back on that idiotic Commish is absolutely necessary though. The Gorelick conflict is the most glaring problem even before Able Danger and must be addressed. Maybe they thought they could just ride it out. If they are truly engaging the image war on the homefront all I can say is, it&#039;s about damn time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, we shall see. The ties between Saddam and AQ/Islamoterror are many, sound and various. It is quite mysterious why the WH has not been on that facet but, hey, they have strategery in mind, I hope. A push-back on that idiotic Commish is absolutely necessary though. The Gorelick conflict is the most glaring problem even before Able Danger and must be addressed. Maybe they thought they could just ride it out. If they are truly engaging the image war on the homefront all I can say is, it&#8217;s about damn time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: algiga</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-4328</link>
		<dc:creator>algiga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:54:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/#comment-4328</guid>
		<description>Right jp. 
Of course it could also be to take the Sheehan phenomenon off the front pages, distract people from the falling popularity of Bush and the war, etc etc</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Right jp.<br />
Of course it could also be to take the Sheehan phenomenon off the front pages, distract people from the falling popularity of Bush and the war, etc etc</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AJStrata</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-4317</link>
		<dc:creator>AJStrata</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:26:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/#comment-4317</guid>
		<description>JP,

You are not the only one who is beginnig to wonder along those lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JP,</p>
<p>You are not the only one who is beginnig to wonder along those lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jp</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/comment-page-1/#comment-4315</link>
		<dc:creator>jp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2005 20:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/08/17/lt-col-anthony-shaffer-on-cnn/#comment-4315</guid>
		<description>Hey there,
I am getting the wonderful feeling that the strategery coming out of the Crawford White House is to go on the offensive against the 9/11 commission, anti-war democrats and people who dont believe the link between iraq and al qaeda. I bet you we will be shown lots of very interesting information, including Clinton&#039;s failure to fight and target Bin Laden when he had the chance in Sudan, &quot;the Wall&quot; - jamie Gorelick failure, and more links including the Prague meeting between saddams people and al qaeda. 
Just a hunch, but these details all dripping out now are very enticing.
cheers
jp</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey there,<br />
I am getting the wonderful feeling that the strategery coming out of the Crawford White House is to go on the offensive against the 9/11 commission, anti-war democrats and people who dont believe the link between iraq and al qaeda. I bet you we will be shown lots of very interesting information, including Clinton&#8217;s failure to fight and target Bin Laden when he had the chance in Sudan, &#8220;the Wall&#8221; &#8211; jamie Gorelick failure, and more links including the Prague meeting between saddams people and al qaeda.<br />
Just a hunch, but these details all dripping out now are very enticing.<br />
cheers<br />
jp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

