Hanson On Gaza
I’ve resisted commenting thus far on Sharon’s policy of pulling out of Gaza – but I think it’s the correct, smart thing to do. The ‘defensible borders’ explanation carries a good deal of weight with me, and it is this explanation that Victor Davis Hanson stresses:
The Israeli military is crafting defensible borders, not unlike the old Roman decision to stay on its own side of the Rhine and Danube Rivers. In Sharon’s thinking, it no longer made any sense to periodically send thousands of soldiers into Gaza to protect fewer than 10,000 Israeli civilians abroad, when a demographic time bomb of too few Jews was ticking inside Israel proper.But Gaza itself is only a tessera in a far larger strategic mosaic. The Israelis also press on with the border fence that will in large part end suicide bombings. The barrier will grant the Palestinians what they clamor for, but perhaps also fear: their own isolated state that they must now govern or let the world watch devolve into something like the Afghanistan of the Taliban.
That Hanson mentions fear on the part of Palestinians is no accident; after years of scapegoating the Israelis for all the wrongs of the world, the prospect of having to handle their own affairs has the Palestinians horrified:
Palestinian medical experts fear a looming health crisis after Israel’s pullout from the Gaza Strip unless patients are guaranteed access to life-saving treatment beyond the territory.
While Israel regards its departure from Gaza as signalling the end of its 38-year occupation, the Palestinians argue that Israel will remain an occupying power as long as it retains control of its borders and is thus still obliged to meet the health needs of the local population.:
Meanwhile, we get word (no joke) that:
Tribune Media Services columnists Victor Davis Hanson and Arianna Huffington will square off in a debate about whether the U.S. is “internationalist or imperial.”The debate is scheduled for Sept. 14 at the Gerald R. Ford Museum Auditorium, Grand Rapids, Mich. It’s the first in a series of events (also taking place Oct. 6-7 and Nov. 17) on “War and Empire” hosted by the Hauenstein Center for Presidential Studies at Grand Valley State University.
Gee, Arianna vs. Hanson – wonder who’ll win THAT matchup?…

Did Arianna only agree to the debate provided she could have 14 well-dressed sycophants standing behind her, holding cocktails, munching on hors d’ouerves and nodding their heads in agreement to everything she says?
Good God! I had some pithy points to make until I got to that last paragraph. VDH vs Arianna is like Mendoza vs Koufax; like American armor vs the Republican guard; like Hitchens vs Sean Penn. Talk about a greasy spot left on the road…
Anyway the “defensible borders” argument strikes a common-sense chord with me. I forget which blogger pointed out that in essence the Palestinians will have their own state; and states can be attacked in self-defense.
Also, Mark, you are so right to point out that the Palestinians (along with the rest of the Arab world) are now in danger of losing their priceless Israeli scapegoat card–and the sooner the better.
jeff,
regarding losing the israeli scapegoat, i think you are waaaayyyyy too optimistic.
More like Bambi versus Godzilla (great short cartoon many years ago, by the way).