<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Krauthammer: Ask Not Towards Whom The Finger Points&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/comment-page-1/#comment-5424</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/#comment-5424</guid>
		<description>Chris, not to mention the way the enviros damn near killed nuclear power, a far cleaner and superior energy source...but that&#039;s a subject for another post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris, not to mention the way the enviros damn near killed nuclear power, a far cleaner and superior energy source&#8230;but that&#8217;s a subject for another post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/comment-page-1/#comment-5423</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Sep 2005 18:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/#comment-5423</guid>
		<description>Well, he could be talking about our nations shortage of oil refineries due to environmental crusades. Our refineries are running at capacity, and after Katrina did so much damage to an area where many refineries are, that leaves no way to have other refineries pick up the slack. Additionally, they are forced to be local furthering their inefficiency.

With current technology we can make cleaner and more efficient refineries, but the environmentally religious zealots and short sighted feel-gooders block such progress every step of the way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, he could be talking about our nations shortage of oil refineries due to environmental crusades. Our refineries are running at capacity, and after Katrina did so much damage to an area where many refineries are, that leaves no way to have other refineries pick up the slack. Additionally, they are forced to be local furthering their inefficiency.</p>
<p>With current technology we can make cleaner and more efficient refineries, but the environmentally religious zealots and short sighted feel-gooders block such progress every step of the way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/comment-page-1/#comment-5302</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 18:34:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/#comment-5302</guid>
		<description>It could be any number of things. You don&#039;t have to be someone who insists we could drive hemp-powered cars to believe that our energy policy, which right now is pretty much keep doing what we&#039;ve always been doing, isn&#039;t particularly wise in the long run. If you want to keep working with oil, we&#039;ve got to start getting serious about building new refineries and drilling in places like ANWR. But I&#039;ve got no problem at all with encouraging more development of technology to cut down on our use of oil, if only because it would be nice to have a technology that didn&#039;t force us to go looking for energy supplies in unstable parts of the world. It might be pie-in-the-sky technology, but you never know until you try.

And it would help if the party that&#039;s supposedly more environmentally friendly wouldn&#039;t start demanding we dip into the SPR every time gas goes up by a nickel. The Democrats seem really torn between their populist intincts to help Joe Lunchbucket when market forces raise prices and their puritanical instincts to view Joe Lunchbucket as a wasteful user of oil who can only be stopped by raising prices by way of taxes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It could be any number of things. You don&#8217;t have to be someone who insists we could drive hemp-powered cars to believe that our energy policy, which right now is pretty much keep doing what we&#8217;ve always been doing, isn&#8217;t particularly wise in the long run. If you want to keep working with oil, we&#8217;ve got to start getting serious about building new refineries and drilling in places like ANWR. But I&#8217;ve got no problem at all with encouraging more development of technology to cut down on our use of oil, if only because it would be nice to have a technology that didn&#8217;t force us to go looking for energy supplies in unstable parts of the world. It might be pie-in-the-sky technology, but you never know until you try.</p>
<p>And it would help if the party that&#8217;s supposedly more environmentally friendly wouldn&#8217;t start demanding we dip into the SPR every time gas goes up by a nickel. The Democrats seem really torn between their populist intincts to help Joe Lunchbucket when market forces raise prices and their puritanical instincts to view Joe Lunchbucket as a wasteful user of oil who can only be stopped by raising prices by way of taxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/comment-page-1/#comment-5295</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/#comment-5295</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I&#039;m curious as to his meaning there, as well...he certainly hinted that he&#039;ll be doing a followup on that, so maybe we&#039;ll see soon...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I&#8217;m curious as to his meaning there, as well&#8230;he certainly hinted that he&#8217;ll be doing a followup on that, so maybe we&#8217;ll see soon&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/comment-page-1/#comment-5294</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 16:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/09/krauthammer-ask-not-towards-whom-the-finger-points/#comment-5294</guid>
		<description>Have I ever mentioned on this blog just how much I love Charles Krauthammer?

But his last paragraph wierded me out a bit.

He only hints at it -- but what&#039;s the relevance of a &quot;responsible energy policy&quot;?  He can&#039;t possibly be thinking about global warming, can he?  (Ok, more likely he&#039;s talking about the rise in oil prices -- which look like it&#039;s not going to be major, between the quick release of the S.P.R. and the fact that N.O. refineries are coming back on line (&lt;a href=&quot;http://sympatico.msn.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/09/07/katrina_overview20050907.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; last item at the bottom -- three of the eight big ones are already back in operation, the worst four will take &quot;months&quot;, well within the S.P.R. margin.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have I ever mentioned on this blog just how much I love Charles Krauthammer?</p>
<p>But his last paragraph wierded me out a bit.</p>
<p>He only hints at it &#8212; but what&#8217;s the relevance of a &#8220;responsible energy policy&#8221;?  He can&#8217;t possibly be thinking about global warming, can he?  (Ok, more likely he&#8217;s talking about the rise in oil prices &#8212; which look like it&#8217;s not going to be major, between the quick release of the S.P.R. and the fact that N.O. refineries are coming back on line (<a href="http://sympatico.msn.cbc.ca/story/world/national/2005/09/07/katrina_overview20050907.html" rel="nofollow">here</a> last item at the bottom &#8212; three of the eight big ones are already back in operation, the worst four will take &#8220;months&#8221;, well within the S.P.R. margin.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

