<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Viking Pundit Strikes Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6128</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 01:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/#comment-6128</guid>
		<description>Got you...crystal clear now...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got you&#8230;crystal clear now&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louielouie</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6120</link>
		<dc:creator>louielouie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2005 00:16:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/#comment-6120</guid>
		<description>as usual i don&#039;t express myself well.
my intent was to say the republicans in  congress, even though in the majority, don&#039;t have the backbone to stand up to the dems on the filibuster rule(s).  imo
my comments regarding blan(k)o, the gov. of la. were due to the fact that she said she would only appear before the committee if they agreed, in advance, not to ask her any questions regarding the handling of matters prior to and after katrina.
when, in fact, the committee hearings were only to discuss the handling of matters before/after katrina.
more clear?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as usual i don&#8217;t express myself well.<br />
my intent was to say the republicans in  congress, even though in the majority, don&#8217;t have the backbone to stand up to the dems on the filibuster rule(s).  imo<br />
my comments regarding blan(k)o, the gov. of la. were due to the fact that she said she would only appear before the committee if they agreed, in advance, not to ask her any questions regarding the handling of matters prior to and after katrina.<br />
when, in fact, the committee hearings were only to discuss the handling of matters before/after katrina.<br />
more clear?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6103</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/#comment-6103</guid>
		<description>louielouie, you lost me there...come again?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>louielouie, you lost me there&#8230;come again?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: louielouie</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/comment-page-1/#comment-6101</link>
		<dc:creator>louielouie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Sep 2005 20:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/09/29/viking-pundit-strikes-again/#comment-6101</guid>
		<description>far be from me to disent.
oh alright.
given the position the republican controlled senate committee took in not questioning  gov. blanks, just by her asking them not to, after the hack job they did to brown a few days before.
i&#039;m not buying the not politicising this arguement.  that was the purpose of the committee hearing.  to politicize  the outcome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>far be from me to disent.<br />
oh alright.<br />
given the position the republican controlled senate committee took in not questioning  gov. blanks, just by her asking them not to, after the hack job they did to brown a few days before.<br />
i&#8217;m not buying the not politicising this arguement.  that was the purpose of the committee hearing.  to politicize  the outcome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

