<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Most Painful Correction of All Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: painful correction &#124; Porn For Free</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-1052385</link>
		<dc:creator>painful correction &#124; Porn For Free</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2011 04:35:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-1052385</guid>
		<description>[...] and latex they explore the borders of any fetish their dirty mind comes up with!File size: 794.2 MBYear of manufacture:2011Genre: Lesbian, All Girl, Latex, Fetish, Toy, Big TitsDuration:21:28.929In r.../&gt;Description:Enjoy our top quality, full length films full of hot girls for whom no kink is too [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and latex they explore the borders of any fetish their dirty mind comes up with!File size: 794.2 MBYear of manufacture:2011Genre: Lesbian, All Girl, Latex, Fetish, Toy, Big TitsDuration:21:28.929In r&#8230;/&gt;Description:Enjoy our top quality, full length films full of hot girls for whom no kink is too [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BizzyBlog &#187; In This Case, Delegation is Definitely a Good Thing</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-240337</link>
		<dc:creator>BizzyBlog &#187; In This Case, Delegation is Definitely a Good Thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 04:05:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-240337</guid>
		<description>[...] That is why I hereby continue to delegate that task of identifying, demanding, and following up on Times corrections to these intrepid bloggers (and others too numerous to mention), who have done and continue to do a marvelous job of riding herd on The Times (links are to each blogger&#8217;s latest Times-related entry; HT Instapundit): - Don Luskin - Michelle Malkin - EU Rota - Tim Worstall - Mediacrity - Decision &#8216;08 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That is why I hereby continue to delegate that task of identifying, demanding, and following up on Times corrections to these intrepid bloggers (and others too numerous to mention), who have done and continue to do a marvelous job of riding herd on The Times (links are to each blogger&#8217;s latest Times-related entry; HT Instapundit): &#8211; Don Luskin &#8211; Michelle Malkin &#8211; EU Rota &#8211; Tim Worstall &#8211; Mediacrity &#8211; Decision &#8216;08 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6607</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 06:31:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6607</guid>
		<description>Please...give me one shred of proof the machines are rigged, or the boards are corrupt...you might be surprised, Nina, to find that Texas is one of the most advanced states in the union when it comes to technology companies and university research...I think you have us confused with Louisiana...we don&#039;t ride horses to work anymore, and some of us have indoor plumbing and electricity now, too...

Really, it must suck going through life being totally paranoid...

Oh, and whoa is me, there&#039;s a line at the DMV!  Why, I might have to actually make a small sacrifice to exercise my responsibilities as a citizen!  The sky is falling...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Please&#8230;give me one shred of proof the machines are rigged, or the boards are corrupt&#8230;you might be surprised, Nina, to find that Texas is one of the most advanced states in the union when it comes to technology companies and university research&#8230;I think you have us confused with Louisiana&#8230;we don&#8217;t ride horses to work anymore, and some of us have indoor plumbing and electricity now, too&#8230;</p>
<p>Really, it must suck going through life being totally paranoid&#8230;</p>
<p>Oh, and whoa is me, there&#8217;s a line at the DMV!  Why, I might have to actually make a small sacrifice to exercise my responsibilities as a citizen!  The sky is falling&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nina</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6606</link>
		<dc:creator>Nina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Oct 2005 05:34:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6606</guid>
		<description>It is a hardship for some people to have to somehow get to the DMV and wait in long lines. The thing amounts to a poll tax.

But in some states (Florida, Ohio, Texas, Georgia) it doesn&#039;t matter whether you vote or not, because the machines are rigged and the election boards are corrupt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is a hardship for some people to have to somehow get to the DMV and wait in long lines. The thing amounts to a poll tax.</p>
<p>But in some states (Florida, Ohio, Texas, Georgia) it doesn&#8217;t matter whether you vote or not, because the machines are rigged and the election boards are corrupt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6503</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Oct 2005 00:30:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6503</guid>
		<description>Yes, what a hardship, Melissa, to be forced to show picture ID!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, what a hardship, Melissa, to be forced to show picture ID!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa in Texas</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6500</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa in Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Oct 2005 23:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6500</guid>
		<description>On voter fraud...
I have a co-worker that came from Mexico and was able to vote in the last presidential election LEGALLY after her citizenship became effective. She was so excited about the process of being able to &quot;voice her opinion&quot;, which by the way was for Bush(which endeared her to me immediately)!
She told me that so many of her &quot;people&quot; had been voting illegally for years, long before they attained citizenship. Guess which party they generally cast their votes for? 
Personally, I think the idea of having to show multiple ID is not  a bad idea.
I do not have a problem carrying my Social Security card, picture ID - for that matter, whatever else they might ask for when I go to the polls. 
At least that way we could know that we are getting votes from people that have the right to vote! 
How many of our elections have been skewed by illegal aliens tossing their ballots in under the radar?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On voter fraud&#8230;<br />
I have a co-worker that came from Mexico and was able to vote in the last presidential election LEGALLY after her citizenship became effective. She was so excited about the process of being able to &#8220;voice her opinion&#8221;, which by the way was for Bush(which endeared her to me immediately)!<br />
She told me that so many of her &#8220;people&#8221; had been voting illegally for years, long before they attained citizenship. Guess which party they generally cast their votes for?<br />
Personally, I think the idea of having to show multiple ID is not  a bad idea.<br />
I do not have a problem carrying my Social Security card, picture ID &#8211; for that matter, whatever else they might ask for when I go to the polls.<br />
At least that way we could know that we are getting votes from people that have the right to vote!<br />
How many of our elections have been skewed by illegal aliens tossing their ballots in under the radar?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Miller</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6388</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:37:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6388</guid>
		<description>Bruce - The problem of vote fraud is something I write about regularly on my web site.  In fact, I was writing about it before I started the site.  Here, for example, is a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.seanet.com/~jimxc/Politics/Cols/Q&amp;A.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Q&amp;A&lt;/a&gt; I did shortly after the 2000 election.  It has some discussion of the problems of fraud in Florida, though I would add quite a bit to it now.

I have been thinking about doing a new summary piece that adds the new evidence.  If I do, I&#039;ll try to remember to email you about it.  The Florida chapter of Fund&#039;s book, &quot;Stealing Elections&quot; has a fair amount of material, including this from page 35:

&quot;In the confusion and chaos after the 2000 election, an anomaly occurred that many people believe ended up costing George W. Bush thousands of votes in Palm Beach.  it appears that as many as 15,000 votes may have been altered and subtracted from the Bush total in Palm Beach County.&quot;

(Several pages of evidence follow.)

I had arrived at about the same number independently, by the way.  And the returns last year provided more evidence for Fund&#039;s argument, since Bush&#039;s vote rebounded to about what one would predict, given the Republican registration in the county.  

As for electronic voting machines, I oppose them and have said so on my site.  Not because they can&#039;t be made reasonably safe, but because a large minority will never believe that they are safe.  Instead I favor using one set of machines to print paper ballots and another entirely separate set of machines to count those ballots.  (And I would allow those who want to challenge an election to bring in their own machines to do recounts.)  Again, this is something I have discussed on my site.

Mark Kleiman&#039;s remark suggests to me that he is not familiar with the history of vote fraud in this country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bruce &#8211; The problem of vote fraud is something I write about regularly on my web site.  In fact, I was writing about it before I started the site.  Here, for example, is a <a href="http://www.seanet.com/~jimxc/Politics/Cols/Q&amp;A.html" rel="nofollow">Q&amp;A</a> I did shortly after the 2000 election.  It has some discussion of the problems of fraud in Florida, though I would add quite a bit to it now.</p>
<p>I have been thinking about doing a new summary piece that adds the new evidence.  If I do, I&#8217;ll try to remember to email you about it.  The Florida chapter of Fund&#8217;s book, &#8220;Stealing Elections&#8221; has a fair amount of material, including this from page 35:</p>
<p>&#8220;In the confusion and chaos after the 2000 election, an anomaly occurred that many people believe ended up costing George W. Bush thousands of votes in Palm Beach.  it appears that as many as 15,000 votes may have been altered and subtracted from the Bush total in Palm Beach County.&#8221;</p>
<p>(Several pages of evidence follow.)</p>
<p>I had arrived at about the same number independently, by the way.  And the returns last year provided more evidence for Fund&#8217;s argument, since Bush&#8217;s vote rebounded to about what one would predict, given the Republican registration in the county.  </p>
<p>As for electronic voting machines, I oppose them and have said so on my site.  Not because they can&#8217;t be made reasonably safe, but because a large minority will never believe that they are safe.  Instead I favor using one set of machines to print paper ballots and another entirely separate set of machines to count those ballots.  (And I would allow those who want to challenge an election to bring in their own machines to do recounts.)  Again, this is something I have discussed on my site.</p>
<p>Mark Kleiman&#8217;s remark suggests to me that he is not familiar with the history of vote fraud in this country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6383</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:16:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6383</guid>
		<description>One last time, Bruce: one great thing about a blog is it&#039;s mine, all mine, totally mine, and I&#039;m under no obligation to blog about anything I don&#039;t want to; if you want the Safire beat, start the anti-Safire blog, then work your butt off every day to nourish your blog like I have...nobody&#039;s stopping you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last time, Bruce: one great thing about a blog is it&#8217;s mine, all mine, totally mine, and I&#8217;m under no obligation to blog about anything I don&#8217;t want to; if you want the Safire beat, start the anti-Safire blog, then work your butt off every day to nourish your blog like I have&#8230;nobody&#8217;s stopping you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Moomaw</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6378</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Moomaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 21:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6378</guid>
		<description>I will say, though, that I agree with you that &quot;the only thing worse than someone who is obviously wrong and refuses to admit it is someone who is shown a correction admitting the person was obviously wrong and STILL refuses to admit it.&quot;  Including Safire and Miller, whose mistakes were vastly larger than Krugman&#039;s, but draw no comment at all from you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will say, though, that I agree with you that &#8220;the only thing worse than someone who is obviously wrong and refuses to admit it is someone who is shown a correction admitting the person was obviously wrong and STILL refuses to admit it.&#8221;  Including Safire and Miller, whose mistakes were vastly larger than Krugman&#8217;s, but draw no comment at all from you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bruce Moomaw</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/comment-page-2/#comment-6377</link>
		<dc:creator>Bruce Moomaw</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Oct 2005 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/10/01/the-most-painful-correction-of-all-time/#comment-6377</guid>
		<description>By the way, the Extremely Partisan Gail Collins -- just after the 2000 election, when she was still writing a column -- attacked Gore for defending the Electoral College because he thought HE&#039;D be the most likely one to benefit from a malfunction of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, the Extremely Partisan Gail Collins &#8212; just after the 2000 election, when she was still writing a column &#8212; attacked Gore for defending the Electoral College because he thought HE&#8217;D be the most likely one to benefit from a malfunction of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

