Comments on: Krauthammer Has The Answer http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/ Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Decision ‘08 » Blog Archive » Krauthammer to the Rescue (Again!) http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-13222 Decision ‘08 » Blog Archive » Krauthammer to the Rescue (Again!) Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:14:43 +0000 http://decision08.net/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/#comment-13222 [...] The Bush Administration would do well to heed any advice coming from Charles Krauthammer on the ports deal; after all, he famously anticipated the clean exit from the Harriet Miers mess. Before he dispenses with his prescription, though, he has a bit of a tongue-lashing to deliver: Congress is up in arms. The Democrats, in particular, are in full cry, gleeful to at last get to the right of George Bush on an issue of national security. [...] [...] The Bush Administration would do well to heed any advice coming from Charles Krauthammer on the ports deal; after all, he famously anticipated the clean exit from the Harriet Miers mess. Before he dispenses with his prescription, though, he has a bit of a tongue-lashing to deliver: Congress is up in arms. The Democrats, in particular, are in full cry, gleeful to at last get to the right of George Bush on an issue of national security. [...]

]]> By: Miriam http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-7143 Miriam Sat, 22 Oct 2005 14:03:41 +0000 http://decision08.net/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/#comment-7143 Don't plunge the knife in her throat, plunge it in her back? WSe're playing the Democrats' game here, and they play it better. Don’t plunge the knife in her throat, plunge it in her back? WSe’re playing the Democrats’ game here, and they play it better.

]]> By: Dennis http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-7139 Dennis Fri, 21 Oct 2005 20:43:51 +0000 http://decision08.net/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/#comment-7139 I've got no problem with the Krauthammer argument except for one thing; how exactly does anyone "save face" when the real story for why she would be dumped is laid out in his column for all to see? Yet that very well might be what happens. The Kabuki theater of Washington rolls merrily along... I’ve got no problem with the Krauthammer argument except for one thing; how exactly does anyone “save face” when the real story for why she would be dumped is laid out in his column for all to see?

Yet that very well might be what happens. The Kabuki theater of Washington rolls merrily along…

]]> By: too many steves http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-7129 too many steves Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:10:49 +0000 http://decision08.net/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/#comment-7129 Let's not forget that this is a political issue/problem which, necessarily, requires a political solution, regardless of how much we might prefer something more direct and less obtuse and nuanced (your word is manufactured). Let’s not forget that this is a political issue/problem which, necessarily, requires a political solution, regardless of how much we might prefer something more direct and less obtuse and nuanced (your word is manufactured).

]]> By: The Commissar http://informedspeculation.com/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/comment-page-1/#comment-7125 The Commissar Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:12 +0000 http://decision08.net/2005/10/21/krauthammer-has-the-answer/#comment-7125 Ed's analysis is right on. Everyone (or at least every Republican) has made such a sticking point of executive privilege, that they <b>must</b> be sending a message by raising it. Like a two cardinals sending the pope a letter, "On this infallibility thing, we think the whole doctrine should be re-examined." Ed’s analysis is right on. Everyone (or at least every Republican) has made such a sticking point of executive privilege, that they must be sending a message by raising it. Like a two cardinals sending the pope a letter, “On this infallibility thing, we think the whole doctrine should be re-examined.”

]]>