<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Looking Ahead to 2006</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Pundit Roundtable Is Up</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-7935</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Pundit Roundtable Is Up</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 18:27:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/#comment-7935</guid>
		<description>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your ownsite. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-7925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:42:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/#comment-7925</guid>
		<description>Eric, good point about the gerrymandering...the incumbent protection racket may yet strike again...I do feel that Bush has started the counter-offensive, but it just hasn&#039;t shown in the polls yet...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eric, good point about the gerrymandering&#8230;the incumbent protection racket may yet strike again&#8230;I do feel that Bush has started the counter-offensive, but it just hasn&#8217;t shown in the polls yet&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Lindholm</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/comment-page-1/#comment-7924</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Lindholm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Nov 2005 03:24:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/11/12/looking-ahead-to-2006/#comment-7924</guid>
		<description>A good analysis, Mark, but a pessimistic estimate.  While the GOP will undoubtably lose seats, gerrymandering has significantly reduced the number of competitive seats up for grabs.  And IIRC there are more Democratic imcumbents considered &quot;competitive&quot; than Republican seats.  The GOP will continue to hold both houses, but with slimmer margins.

Election 2006 is a year away - a lifetime in politics.  If Bush starts to press back on Iraq, then the Iraqis hold elections next month, then Libby pleads out, everything may even out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A good analysis, Mark, but a pessimistic estimate.  While the GOP will undoubtably lose seats, gerrymandering has significantly reduced the number of competitive seats up for grabs.  And IIRC there are more Democratic imcumbents considered &#8220;competitive&#8221; than Republican seats.  The GOP will continue to hold both houses, but with slimmer margins.</p>
<p>Election 2006 is a year away &#8211; a lifetime in politics.  If Bush starts to press back on Iraq, then the Iraqis hold elections next month, then Libby pleads out, everything may even out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

