Democrats Once Again Snatching Defeat From the Jaws of Victory
That loud rustle you hear is the sound of worried Democrats sensing that they may have once again blown a wide-open opportunity:
Strong antiwar comments in recent days by House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi and Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean have opened anew a party rift over Iraq, with some lawmakers warning that the leaders’ rhetorical blasts could harm efforts to win control of Congress next year.
Several Democrats joined President Bush yesterday in rebuking Dean’s declaration to a San Antonio radio station Monday that “the idea that we’re going to win the war in Iraq is an idea which is just plain wrong.”
The critics said that comment could reinforce popular perceptions that the party is weak on military matters and divert attention from the president’s growing political problems on the war and other issues. “Dean’s take on Iraq makes even less sense than the scream in Iowa: Both are uninformed and unhelpful,” said Rep. Jim Marshall (D-Ga.), recalling Dean’s famous election-night roar after stumbling in Iowa during his 2004 presidential bid.
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Rahm Emanuel (Ill.) and Rep. Steny H. Hoyer (Md.), the second-ranking House Democratic leader, have told colleagues that Pelosi’s recent endorsement of a speedy withdrawal, combined with her claim that more than half of House Democrats support her position, could backfire on the party, congressional sources said.
…Despite Pelosi’s claims that she echoes the views of most members in her caucus, plenty of Democrats are cringing at her new high profile on an Iraq withdrawal. Not only did she back a position that polls show most Americans do not support, but she also did this when Bush is trying to move off the defensive by accusing Democrats of supporting a de facto surrender.
“We have not blown our chance” of winning back the House but “we have jeopardized it,” said a top strategist to House Democrats, who requested anonymity to speak freely about influential party leaders. “It raises questions about whether we are capable of seizing political opportunities or whether we cannot help ourselves and blow it” by playing to the liberal base of the party.
How about that Howard Dean, eh? You’re doing a heckuva job, Howie…

Somebody get that guy a microphone!
Let’s see…Scooter Libby indicted or Howard Dean’s recent statements…
Which is politically more significant?
Which is easier to explain to the general electorate?
Months of pressure, focus, attention on the Plame case…and all it takes is one Dean verbal explosion-which is consistent with the far left donors of the party-to decimate his own parties chances in 06.
or hoe about the galavanizing effect it will rpovde for the GOP? 06 candidates fear discussing the war, but now they can discuss the war in the context of Dean’s statements…
His Chairmanship is the greatest achievement for the gop since the election of 04. Time for dems to play defense…over the holiday seasons, where there will be a significant newsgap…
Dean’s statements and Iraqi elections on Dec 15…
Merry Fitzmas.
So Nancy feels half of the Demon-rats in the house support a speedy withdrawal. Apparently she missed the vote a few weeks back on a similar issue. It was 403-3 against. Stuck on stupid and a whole lot more.