Comments on: A Pending Rove Indictment? http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/14/a-pending-rove-indictment/ Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Free Credit Reporting Act http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/14/a-pending-rove-indictment/comment-page-1/#comment-445502 Free Credit Reporting Act Mon, 04 Feb 2008 08:10:00 +0000 http://decision08.net/2005/12/14/a-pending-rove-indictment/#comment-445502 <strong>Credit Reporting Agencies...</strong> Credit reporting agencies maintain electronic records of your credit activities. Today, there are three major national credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and Trans Union. If you are planning on applying for a loan or credit anytime in the near future, i... Credit Reporting Agencies…

Credit reporting agencies maintain electronic records of your credit activities. Today, there are three major national credit bureaus: Equifax, Experian and Trans Union. If you are planning on applying for a loan or credit anytime in the near future, i…

]]> By: mtl http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/14/a-pending-rove-indictment/comment-page-1/#comment-8982 mtl Wed, 14 Dec 2005 22:21:32 +0000 http://decision08.net/2005/12/14/a-pending-rove-indictment/#comment-8982 Even if true, it is now irrelevant, other than a 2-3 pts swing on Bush's approval numbers, for about two weeks. Dems made the mistake of hyping it for the actual crime of outing a CIA agent. IT already has failed. They are on to perjury/obstruction... but then it wasn't a serious crime when Clinton was President...after all it was a lie about sex (in a sexual harrasment lawsuit that was settled). Rove's perjury/obstruction, if ever proven true, will be in the prosectuion of crime that was not committed. Just doesn't have the umpph anymore, but that won't stop the libs from thinking they hit paydirt. They have been thinking they hit paydirt since 2000, despite their lack of political success. Nada-gate. and who thought the NYT editorial staff was completely useless. Let them rattle their sabres, and divert away from their current gaffes, but a week after the indictment, if there is an indictment, we will have new comedy brought to our attention by the DNC. Even if true, it is now irrelevant, other than a 2-3 pts swing on Bush’s approval numbers, for about two weeks.

Dems made the mistake of hyping it for the actual crime of outing a CIA agent. IT already has failed.

They are on to perjury/obstruction…
but then it wasn’t a serious crime when Clinton was President…after all it was a lie about sex (in a sexual harrasment lawsuit that was settled).

Rove’s perjury/obstruction, if ever proven true, will be in the prosectuion of crime that was not committed.

Just doesn’t have the umpph anymore, but that won’t stop the libs from thinking they hit paydirt.
They have been thinking they hit paydirt since 2000, despite their lack of political success.

Nada-gate. and who thought the NYT editorial staff was completely useless. Let them rattle their sabres, and divert away from their current gaffes, but a week after the indictment, if there is an indictment, we will have new comedy brought to our attention by the DNC.

]]>