<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Woodward Dismisses Conspiracy In Plame Case</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/20/woodward-dismisses-conspiracy-in-plame-case/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/20/woodward-dismisses-conspiracy-in-plame-case/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Plame Leak Outside White House</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/20/woodward-dismisses-conspiracy-in-plame-case/comment-page-1/#comment-9367</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Plame Leak Outside White House</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/20/woodward-dismisses-conspiracy-in-plame-case/#comment-9367</guid>
		<description>[...] In what has to be a massive blow to the leftward fringes, Bob Woodward has confident (with accuracy in my opinion) that Novak&#8217;s source on Plame is outside the White House. Via Decision &#8216;08, Tom Maguire discusses the scoop from this Harvard Crimson article:  But in a conversation at Harvard earlier this month, Woodward hinted that he knows the identity of yet another key player in the case: Robert D. Novak’s original source for his July 2003 column on Plame, which touched off the scandal in the first place. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In what has to be a massive blow to the leftward fringes, Bob Woodward has confident (with accuracy in my opinion) that Novak&#8217;s source on Plame is outside the White House. Via Decision &#8216;08, Tom Maguire discusses the scoop from this Harvard Crimson article:  But in a conversation at Harvard earlier this month, Woodward hinted that he knows the identity of yet another key player in the case: Robert D. Novak’s original source for his July 2003 column on Plame, which touched off the scandal in the first place. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/20/woodward-dismisses-conspiracy-in-plame-case/comment-page-1/#comment-9364</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 18:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/20/woodward-dismisses-conspiracy-in-plame-case/#comment-9364</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Plame Leak Outside White House&lt;/strong&gt;

	In what has to be a massive blow to the leftward fringes, Bob Woodward has confident (with accuracy in my opinion) that Novak&#8217;s source on Plame is outside the White House.  Via Decision &#8216;08, Tom Maguire discusses the scoop from this Harvar...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Plame Leak Outside White House</strong></p>
<p>	In what has to be a massive blow to the leftward fringes, Bob Woodward has confident (with accuracy in my opinion) that Novak&#8217;s source on Plame is outside the White House.  Via Decision &#8216;08, Tom Maguire discusses the scoop from this Harvar&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

