<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Only A Fool Would Talk Impeachment&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:27:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bob Waters</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/comment-page-1/#comment-9698</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Waters</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Dec 2005 00:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/#comment-9698</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Gone?&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Gone?</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/comment-page-1/#comment-9584</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/#comment-9584</guid>
		<description>Or rather...

Yet &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2005/12/when_it_leaks_it_pours.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another leak&lt;/a&gt;!  (mistyped link)

Question: Has the entire Washington press corps gone insane?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or rather&#8230;</p>
<p>Yet <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2005/12/when_it_leaks_it_pours.html" rel="nofollow">another leak</a>!  (mistyped link)</p>
<p>Question: Has the entire Washington press corps gone insane?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/comment-page-1/#comment-9583</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 21:50:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/#comment-9583</guid>
		<description>Yet &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2005/12when_it_leaks_it_pours.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;another leak&lt;/a&gt;!

Question: Has the entire Washington press corps gone insane?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet <a href="http://www.realclearpolitics.com/blog/2005/12when_it_leaks_it_pours.html" rel="nofollow">another leak</a>!</p>
<p>Question: Has the entire Washington press corps gone insane?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/comment-page-1/#comment-9561</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 17:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/#comment-9561</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;New Day, The Left Is Still Insane&lt;/strong&gt;

	Updates at the end
	There are so many examples of the left&#8217;s self destruction on the NSA monitoring of Al Qaeda and Terrorist contacts in the US it simply boggles the mind so many people could have been swept up in the madness.  Not most people ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>New Day, The Left Is Still Insane</strong></p>
<p>	Updates at the end<br />
	There are so many examples of the left&#8217;s self destruction on the NSA monitoring of Al Qaeda and Terrorist contacts in the US it simply boggles the mind so many people could have been swept up in the madness.  Not most people &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/comment-page-1/#comment-9543</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 14:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/#comment-9543</guid>
		<description>The impeachment of Clinton worked, in a short term political sense, in that it disabled him from pursuing his agenda (such as it was).  Even though lots of people agreed that it was &quot;just about sex&quot;, the details (dresses, cigars) were so unseemly that Clinton became politically radioactive and, thus, impotent.

Were the Democrats to pursue impeachment of Bush they might actually enhance his political strength.  I&#039;ve seen no one (zippo) credibly accuse Bush of using this surveillance program to spy on is political or personal enemies, a la Hoover and Nixon.  The Democrats would be left with accusing Bush of breaking the law (which is hardly settled) for the purpose of protecting the American people from further terrorist attack.  I don&#039;t see how the President loses in that scenario.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The impeachment of Clinton worked, in a short term political sense, in that it disabled him from pursuing his agenda (such as it was).  Even though lots of people agreed that it was &#8220;just about sex&#8221;, the details (dresses, cigars) were so unseemly that Clinton became politically radioactive and, thus, impotent.</p>
<p>Were the Democrats to pursue impeachment of Bush they might actually enhance his political strength.  I&#8217;ve seen no one (zippo) credibly accuse Bush of using this surveillance program to spy on is political or personal enemies, a la Hoover and Nixon.  The Democrats would be left with accusing Bush of breaking the law (which is hardly settled) for the purpose of protecting the American people from further terrorist attack.  I don&#8217;t see how the President loses in that scenario.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AcademicElephant</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/comment-page-1/#comment-9539</link>
		<dc:creator>AcademicElephant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Dec 2005 12:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2005/12/23/only-a-fool-would-talk-impeachment/#comment-9539</guid>
		<description>I know I&#039;m not really here, but I just have to say that the geniuses who decided that &quot;Attack the President for Fighting  Terrorists&quot; was the viable alternative strategy when &quot;Cut and Run in Iraq&quot; didn&#039;t pan out should get lumps of coal in their stockings.  Not only is it terrible strategy, but as this proves, it&#039;s demonstrably wrong.

Ho ho ho.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know I&#8217;m not really here, but I just have to say that the geniuses who decided that &#8220;Attack the President for Fighting  Terrorists&#8221; was the viable alternative strategy when &#8220;Cut and Run in Iraq&#8221; didn&#8217;t pan out should get lumps of coal in their stockings.  Not only is it terrible strategy, but as this proves, it&#8217;s demonstrably wrong.</p>
<p>Ho ho ho.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
