<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The First Annual Duncan Black Award For Overheated Punditry&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is NBC Sitting On A Blockbuster?</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/comment-page-1/#comment-10130</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Is NBC Sitting On A Blockbuster?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jan 2006 17:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/#comment-10130</guid>
		<description>[...] Just days ago I had some unkind words for Duncan Black&#8217;s hysterical rantings about the possibility of bloggers being shot in the head for opposing Bush, but he deserves kudos for noticing a deleted portion of an Andrea Mitchell interview transcript that has explosive potential: Mitchell: Do you have any information about reporters being swept up in this net? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Just days ago I had some unkind words for Duncan Black&#8217;s hysterical rantings about the possibility of bloggers being shot in the head for opposing Bush, but he deserves kudos for noticing a deleted portion of an Andrea Mitchell interview transcript that has explosive potential: Mitchell: Do you have any information about reporters being swept up in this net? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/comment-page-1/#comment-9992</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:41:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/#comment-9992</guid>
		<description>You said it!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You said it!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/comment-page-1/#comment-9991</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2006 18:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/02/the-first-annual-duncan-black-award-for-overheated-punditry/#comment-9991</guid>
		<description>I get the feeling that certain practitioners of that paranoid style of politics are driven mostly by a strong martyr complex. Being on the losing side of elections energizes them, because it allows them to wallow in self-pity and disgust for the the accursed majority.

I think some of them desperately &lt;i&gt;want&lt;/i&gt; Bush to be a dictator in the true sense of the word, shipping off nattering bloggers to Gitmo, so they can feel validated in their most negative, vile feelings about the president. 

And it&#039;s worth noting that Duncan Black has just gone on record saying Bush is a dictator and his next step could be to shoot bloggers he doesn&#039;t like. So what is Black doing about this horrible turn of events? In the face of a clear, very personal threat, is he raising a rebel army or getting people to march in the streets? No, he&#039;s bitching about it on the Internet. The guy either lacks the courage of his convictions or knows he&#039;s writing piffle, but doesn&#039;t care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get the feeling that certain practitioners of that paranoid style of politics are driven mostly by a strong martyr complex. Being on the losing side of elections energizes them, because it allows them to wallow in self-pity and disgust for the the accursed majority.</p>
<p>I think some of them desperately <i>want</i> Bush to be a dictator in the true sense of the word, shipping off nattering bloggers to Gitmo, so they can feel validated in their most negative, vile feelings about the president. </p>
<p>And it&#8217;s worth noting that Duncan Black has just gone on record saying Bush is a dictator and his next step could be to shoot bloggers he doesn&#8217;t like. So what is Black doing about this horrible turn of events? In the face of a clear, very personal threat, is he raising a rebel army or getting people to march in the streets? No, he&#8217;s bitching about it on the Internet. The guy either lacks the courage of his convictions or knows he&#8217;s writing piffle, but doesn&#8217;t care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

