<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Three Takes on bin Laden</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-11542</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 04:19:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/#comment-11542</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Is Al Qaeda losing?&lt;/strong&gt;

	Chris Hitchens argues &#8220;yes&#8221;:
	I once hypothesized that Osama Bin Laden might be dead. The induction went like this: Proof of life is easy to furnish, but some of the tapes allegedly showing him could easily have been cobbled from earlier r...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Is Al Qaeda losing?</strong></p>
<p>	Chris Hitchens argues &#8220;yes&#8221;:<br />
	I once hypothesized that Osama Bin Laden might be dead. The induction went like this: Proof of life is easy to furnish, but some of the tapes allegedly showing him could easily have been cobbled from earlier r&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-11536</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/#comment-11536</guid>
		<description>dmac, I had not seen that - thanks for the link...very, very interesting, isn&#039;t it?  You know, it&#039;s kind of poor taste to root for someone&#039;s death, but...let&#039;s just leave it there...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dmac, I had not seen that &#8211; thanks for the link&#8230;very, very interesting, isn&#8217;t it?  You know, it&#8217;s kind of poor taste to root for someone&#8217;s death, but&#8230;let&#8217;s just leave it there&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-11530</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 23:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/#comment-11530</guid>
		<description>Mark - sorry to change the subject, but it looks like the Iranian madman&#039;s own people just missed sending him to his 72 virgins again: 

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/25/international/middleeast/25iran.html?_r=1

I don&#039;t see how anyone can say with a straight face that he&#039;s not going to be eliminated before this thing reaches the crisis stage - this latest effort now makes it two attempts to take him out, in full public view.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark &#8211; sorry to change the subject, but it looks like the Iranian madman&#8217;s own people just missed sending him to his 72 virgins again: </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/25/international/middleeast/25iran.html?_r=1" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/25/international/middleeast/25iran.html?_r=1</a></p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see how anyone can say with a straight face that he&#8217;s not going to be eliminated before this thing reaches the crisis stage &#8211; this latest effort now makes it two attempts to take him out, in full public view.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-11518</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/#comment-11518</guid>
		<description>Comrades,

   One thing about Hitchens is that, unlike many others of the left, he will give credit where and when it is due. He comes the closest of any of the libs to actually being open-minded and objective. Not always, mind you, but I have more respect for him than any of the others.

   Respects,

       Tim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Comrades,</p>
<p>   One thing about Hitchens is that, unlike many others of the left, he will give credit where and when it is due. He comes the closest of any of the libs to actually being open-minded and objective. Not always, mind you, but I have more respect for him than any of the others.</p>
<p>   Respects,</p>
<p>       Tim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/comment-page-1/#comment-11516</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/01/25/three-takes-on-bin-laden/#comment-11516</guid>
		<description>Interesting thing about Hitchens is you can&#039;t stay upset with the guy for something he writes which really rubs you the wrong way for long, because then he&#039;ll come back and perform a rhetorical vivesection on the antiwar folks out there.  

A loose-cannon Hitchens is worth the entire editorial staff of the New York Times.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting thing about Hitchens is you can&#8217;t stay upset with the guy for something he writes which really rubs you the wrong way for long, because then he&#8217;ll come back and perform a rhetorical vivesection on the antiwar folks out there.  </p>
<p>A loose-cannon Hitchens is worth the entire editorial staff of the New York Times.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

