<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Return of the Senior White House Officials</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: All Things Beautiful</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12844</link>
		<dc:creator>All Things Beautiful</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12844</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Another Black Eye For The MSM&lt;/strong&gt;

In the absence of any pressing news these days -- other than Iran&#039;s nuclear weapons development crisis, the election of Hamas terrorists in Palestine, ongoing worldwide Muslim riots and killing in reaction to a cartoon, Al Gore&#039;s near sedition while ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Another Black Eye For The MSM</strong></p>
<p>In the absence of any pressing news these days &#8212; other than Iran&#8217;s nuclear weapons development crisis, the election of Hamas terrorists in Palestine, ongoing worldwide Muslim riots and killing in reaction to a cartoon, Al Gore&#8217;s near sedition while &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12825</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:41:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12825</guid>
		<description>There are plenty of outrageous things Cheney has done, faux and vrai.  I think that delaying the release of the story (presumably to avoid the Sunday morning news shows) is fairly low on the list, but the ham-fisted response makes things look worse than they should.

Regarding the White House press corps:  do you think that Clinton got better treatment from the press than Bush?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There are plenty of outrageous things Cheney has done, faux and vrai.  I think that delaying the release of the story (presumably to avoid the Sunday morning news shows) is fairly low on the list, but the ham-fisted response makes things look worse than they should.</p>
<p>Regarding the White House press corps:  do you think that Clinton got better treatment from the press than Bush?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12824</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:05:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12824</guid>
		<description>TMS-

You give the press corps far too much credit.

An instantaneous, clear and unequivocal disclosure (which, as &#039;cb&#039; says, is basically what we had!!) would have changed exactly one thing: the minor details of the faux outrage du jour.

I share your impression of the White House Press Pool.  Yesterday Scott McClellan chided a reporter that he was trying to make it &quot;all about you&quot; -- the Press corps should be careful what they wish for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMS-</p>
<p>You give the press corps far too much credit.</p>
<p>An instantaneous, clear and unequivocal disclosure (which, as &#8216;cb&#8217; says, is basically what we had!!) would have changed exactly one thing: the minor details of the faux outrage du jour.</p>
<p>I share your impression of the White House Press Pool.  Yesterday Scott McClellan chided a reporter that he was trying to make it &#8220;all about you&#8221; &#8212; the Press corps should be careful what they wish for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12823</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:59:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12823</guid>
		<description>An interesting juxtaposition of questions:

&quot;when’s the last time you saw a good piece on what’s going in with the attempts to form a government in Iraq? How’s that plan to put UN peacekeepers into Darfur going? What are we going to do about our increasing indebtedness to China?&quot;

The answers:

1)  What&#039;s going on with the government in Iraq is this week marked the Shiite-led appointment of the prime minister, who has extensive ties with Tehran (so this is what 2250 Americans died for -- so Iran can extend its influence in the Middle East?)
2)  As far as I can tell, nothing is going on
3)  Ditto:  it gets worse with every treasury auction

So while the Cheney shooting incident may be a diversion, the &quot;real news&quot; isn&#039;t much better for the Bush administration --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An interesting juxtaposition of questions:</p>
<p>&#8220;when’s the last time you saw a good piece on what’s going in with the attempts to form a government in Iraq? How’s that plan to put UN peacekeepers into Darfur going? What are we going to do about our increasing indebtedness to China?&#8221;</p>
<p>The answers:</p>
<p>1)  What&#8217;s going on with the government in Iraq is this week marked the Shiite-led appointment of the prime minister, who has extensive ties with Tehran (so this is what 2250 Americans died for &#8212; so Iran can extend its influence in the Middle East?)<br />
2)  As far as I can tell, nothing is going on<br />
3)  Ditto:  it gets worse with every treasury auction</p>
<p>So while the Cheney shooting incident may be a diversion, the &#8220;real news&#8221; isn&#8217;t much better for the Bush administration &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12818</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:44:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12818</guid>
		<description>The whole thing could have been avoided, for sure, by a clear and unequivocal disclosure.  Personally I don&#039;t really care.

The bigger story for me is the hyperventilating huff that the White House Press Pool have fomented into.  Is it me or do they sound like a whiny, wounded bunch of windbags who are offended that they weren&#039;t told the story first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole thing could have been avoided, for sure, by a clear and unequivocal disclosure.  Personally I don&#8217;t really care.</p>
<p>The bigger story for me is the hyperventilating huff that the White House Press Pool have fomented into.  Is it me or do they sound like a whiny, wounded bunch of windbags who are offended that they weren&#8217;t told the story first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: relish</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12817</link>
		<dc:creator>relish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12817</guid>
		<description>Somehow, I have the feeling that if Cheney had been the one shot, this story would be over by now...how sad is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow, I have the feeling that if Cheney had been the one shot, this story would be over by now&#8230;how sad is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Moderate Voice</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12814</link>
		<dc:creator>The Moderate Voice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:25:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12814</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Former GOP White House Press Secretaries And PR Experts Blast   Cheney Shooting Handling&lt;/strong&gt;

Vice President Dick Cheney and the White House are now coming under intense criticism from several prominent former Republican White House press secretaries and public relations experts for the way  the press and public learned that Cheney had accident...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Former GOP White House Press Secretaries And PR Experts Blast   Cheney Shooting Handling</strong></p>
<p>Vice President Dick Cheney and the White House are now coming under intense criticism from several prominent former Republican White House press secretaries and public relations experts for the way  the press and public learned that Cheney had accident&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/comment-page-1/#comment-12813</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/14/the-return-of-the-senior-white-house-officials/#comment-12813</guid>
		<description>For the nature of this incident, and its impact with respect to anything of any importance, &quot;breaking&quot; the story within 18 hours IS &quot;immediate&quot;.

&quot;Political liability&quot;? Please... in Moonbat-land, maybe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For the nature of this incident, and its impact with respect to anything of any importance, &#8220;breaking&#8221; the story within 18 hours IS &#8220;immediate&#8221;.</p>
<p>&#8220;Political liability&#8221;? Please&#8230; in Moonbat-land, maybe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

