http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/ Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-13280 Mark Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:29:25 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/#comment-13280 Ryan, I agree that we can't say for certain which way they would go...I know the conventional wisdom is that Alito is for sure a no vote, but never say never... Ryan, I agree that we can’t say for certain which way they would go…I know the conventional wisdom is that Alito is for sure a no vote, but never say never…

]]> http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-13275 Ryan Bonneville Sat, 25 Feb 2006 16:47:16 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/#comment-13275 All of this assumes that Roberts and Alito are "no" votes. What if the Supreme Court ends up taking it because everyone on the Court knows one or both of them is a "yea" vote? That would shut South Dakota up. All of this assumes that Roberts and Alito are “no” votes. What if the Supreme Court ends up taking it because everyone on the Court knows one or both of them is a “yea” vote? That would shut South Dakota up.

]]> http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-13274 Mark Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:19:46 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/#comment-13274 RiverRat, you're quite right that it wouldn't be in 2006 in all likelihood anyway, due to the time it would take to go through the other courts. But the idiot in this case would have to be me, as I don't think Williams used the phrasing I did... RiverRat, you’re quite right that it wouldn’t be in 2006 in all likelihood anyway, due to the time it would take to go through the other courts. But the idiot in this case would have to be me, as I don’t think Williams used the phrasing I did…

]]> http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-13268 RiverRat Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:33:52 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/#comment-13268 Most knowledgable observers say it will take two or three years, at a minimum, for this case to even reach SCOTUS. Pete Williams sounds like another MSM idiot. Most knowledgable observers say it will take two or three years, at a minimum, for this case to even reach SCOTUS. Pete Williams sounds like another MSM idiot.

]]> http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/comment-page-1/#comment-13267 cb Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:25:27 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/02/24/will-the-south-dakota-law-trigger-a-review-of-roe/#comment-13267 Maybe this time (whenever "this time" actually comes about), they'll plunge into the emanations of penumbras, and pull out the Tenth Amendment... Maybe this time (whenever “this time” actually comes about), they’ll plunge into the emanations of penumbras, and pull out the Tenth Amendment…

]]>