<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Kristol&#8217;s Call To Arms</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/25/kristols-call-to-arms/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/25/kristols-call-to-arms/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Colin</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/25/kristols-call-to-arms/comment-page-1/#comment-13287</link>
		<dc:creator>Colin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/25/kristols-call-to-arms/#comment-13287</guid>
		<description>Thank God for people like Kristol on the Right.  What his crowd (derisively called &quot;Neo-Cons&quot;) has done has pushed conservatism past Buckley&#039;s famous description of &quot;Standing athwart history yelling &#039;Stop!&#039;&quot;.  Finally the right has a vision of the future, not simply a longing for the past (which is not a bad thing, but not all that is needed to advance thought).  Don&#039;t get me wrong, I like a lot of what William F. Buckley says.  I just don&#039;t think he (and other conservatives like Robert Novak) have a plan for our current world, with America engaged with everyone else on the planet.  

The Right is going to have to choose whose vision they want to follow - Buckley&#039;s or Kristol&#039;s.  Considering the love still felt for Reagan felt by many on the Right, I am hopeful they will choose Kristol&#039;s.

Of course, I could be wrong.  Wouldn&#039;t be the first time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank God for people like Kristol on the Right.  What his crowd (derisively called &#8220;Neo-Cons&#8221;) has done has pushed conservatism past Buckley&#8217;s famous description of &#8220;Standing athwart history yelling &#8216;Stop!&#8217;&#8221;.  Finally the right has a vision of the future, not simply a longing for the past (which is not a bad thing, but not all that is needed to advance thought).  Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I like a lot of what William F. Buckley says.  I just don&#8217;t think he (and other conservatives like Robert Novak) have a plan for our current world, with America engaged with everyone else on the planet.  </p>
<p>The Right is going to have to choose whose vision they want to follow &#8211; Buckley&#8217;s or Kristol&#8217;s.  Considering the love still felt for Reagan felt by many on the Right, I am hopeful they will choose Kristol&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Of course, I could be wrong.  Wouldn&#8217;t be the first time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

