<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Poll: All Tied, Again</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/27/new-poll-all-tied-again/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/27/new-poll-all-tied-again/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/27/new-poll-all-tied-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13402</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/27/new-poll-all-tied-again/#comment-13402</guid>
		<description>The prospect of a McCain candidacy is fascinating if only because I&#039;ll be very curious to see how he gets treated in the media. He&#039;s a rarity among politicians in that he speaks to journalists in a way that indicates he&#039;s actually &lt;i&gt;talking&lt;/i&gt; with him, not spitting out soundbites in the robotic way that most candidates wind up doing. For all the talk about media bias, I think this is the biggest reason why he gets good press. (See the Michael Lewis book &quot;Losers&quot; about the &#039;96 Republican primaries for a good example of how this works. Whether it&#039;s deliberate ego-stroking or simple people skills, it works.)

But assuming he runs in 2008, he&#039;d no longer be the maverick; he&#039;d be the front runner, or at worst a co-front runner with Giuliani. Will he still get such slavish press, especially when he starts reminding people regularly that he&#039;s pro-life, pro-war, etc.?

I lean a little more toward Giuliani, mostly because as mayor, he accomplished a lot, and senators by nature tend to be showhorses. But if McCain&#039;s the nominee, I&#039;d probably vote for him without a second thought. (Well, maybe without a third thought; I don&#039;t like his stance on campaign finance, and I think he&#039;s squishy on tax cuts. But if he really is dedicated to cutting spending, I can accept limited tax squishiness.)

One other thing I would hope for under a McCain presidency is some of the BDS would die down among the opposition. It&#039;s hard to get MDS when John Kerry was courting the guy to run for veep in 2004. Of course, the most ardent BDS folks have turned on Joe Lieberman, so maybe that&#039;s a false hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The prospect of a McCain candidacy is fascinating if only because I&#8217;ll be very curious to see how he gets treated in the media. He&#8217;s a rarity among politicians in that he speaks to journalists in a way that indicates he&#8217;s actually <i>talking</i> with him, not spitting out soundbites in the robotic way that most candidates wind up doing. For all the talk about media bias, I think this is the biggest reason why he gets good press. (See the Michael Lewis book &#8220;Losers&#8221; about the &#8217;96 Republican primaries for a good example of how this works. Whether it&#8217;s deliberate ego-stroking or simple people skills, it works.)</p>
<p>But assuming he runs in 2008, he&#8217;d no longer be the maverick; he&#8217;d be the front runner, or at worst a co-front runner with Giuliani. Will he still get such slavish press, especially when he starts reminding people regularly that he&#8217;s pro-life, pro-war, etc.?</p>
<p>I lean a little more toward Giuliani, mostly because as mayor, he accomplished a lot, and senators by nature tend to be showhorses. But if McCain&#8217;s the nominee, I&#8217;d probably vote for him without a second thought. (Well, maybe without a third thought; I don&#8217;t like his stance on campaign finance, and I think he&#8217;s squishy on tax cuts. But if he really is dedicated to cutting spending, I can accept limited tax squishiness.)</p>
<p>One other thing I would hope for under a McCain presidency is some of the BDS would die down among the opposition. It&#8217;s hard to get MDS when John Kerry was courting the guy to run for veep in 2004. Of course, the most ardent BDS folks have turned on Joe Lieberman, so maybe that&#8217;s a false hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Muffin the Cat</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/27/new-poll-all-tied-again/comment-page-1/#comment-13384</link>
		<dc:creator>Muffin the Cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 03:02:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/27/new-poll-all-tied-again/#comment-13384</guid>
		<description>I do prefer Rudy over McCain at this point.  I see Rudy as having better leadership skills but I do feel he will have a hard time in the south.  I was reading through the recent report on left wing bias in the news via the UCLA study a few months ago and they have McCain as a middle of the road Republican.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I do prefer Rudy over McCain at this point.  I see Rudy as having better leadership skills but I do feel he will have a hard time in the south.  I was reading through the recent report on left wing bias in the news via the UCLA study a few months ago and they have McCain as a middle of the road Republican.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

