<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tuesday Evening Quick Shots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: megapotamus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13483</link>
		<dc:creator>megapotamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 16:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/#comment-13483</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure the poll needs any kind of partisan debunking from the Right. While making the stipulations that we should remain in force as long as is necessary, it&#039;s plain that necessity will abate well within the year in question. Also the argument that our presence is provocative to the jihadis and their friends, while failing to negate the imperative of removing Saddam, is much more salient with an Iraqi sovereignty in place. That the troops on the ground would give a year as a general timeframe isn&#039;t inappropriate or and indictment of the war at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure the poll needs any kind of partisan debunking from the Right. While making the stipulations that we should remain in force as long as is necessary, it&#8217;s plain that necessity will abate well within the year in question. Also the argument that our presence is provocative to the jihadis and their friends, while failing to negate the imperative of removing Saddam, is much more salient with an Iraqi sovereignty in place. That the troops on the ground would give a year as a general timeframe isn&#8217;t inappropriate or and indictment of the war at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Bremson</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13472</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Bremson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 14:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/#comment-13472</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to the article in Stars and Stripes. 

So &quot;85 percent believe a major reason they were sent into war was to retaliate for Saddam’s role in the Sept. 11 attacks.” 

That, among other things in the article, is very interesting. It&#039;s too bad our men and women are dying over there, and most of them don&#039;t even know why.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the article in Stars and Stripes. </p>
<p>So &#8220;85 percent believe a major reason they were sent into war was to retaliate for Saddam’s role in the Sept. 11 attacks.” </p>
<p>That, among other things in the article, is very interesting. It&#8217;s too bad our men and women are dying over there, and most of them don&#8217;t even know why.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris J. Breisch</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/comment-page-1/#comment-13469</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris J. Breisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 13:18:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/02/28/tuesday-evening-quick-shots-2/#comment-13469</guid>
		<description>Decent analysis of the Zogby poll over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://newsbusters.org/node/4227&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;NewsBusters&lt;/a&gt;.  Might want to check it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Decent analysis of the Zogby poll over at <a href="http://newsbusters.org/node/4227" rel="nofollow">NewsBusters</a>.  Might want to check it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

