<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Peggy Noonan On George Clooney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/comment-page-1/#comment-13928</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/#comment-13928</guid>
		<description>On the last edition of Sunday Morning, speaking of the Oscars, they said it was unfair to compare the best picture-nominees to blockbusters like Star Wars in terms of earnings. Quite true; they should, instead be compared to films like, oh, I don&#039;t know, The &lt;i&gt;Passion of the Christ&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the last edition of Sunday Morning, speaking of the Oscars, they said it was unfair to compare the best picture-nominees to blockbusters like Star Wars in terms of earnings. Quite true; they should, instead be compared to films like, oh, I don&#8217;t know, The <i>Passion of the Christ</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/comment-page-1/#comment-13920</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/#comment-13920</guid>
		<description>Hollywood has always been self - referential, but the hagiographies that they presently give themselves have gone around the bend over the past decade. We always hear about the blending of art and commerce, but it&#039;s really just about the commerce these days, and they know it.

Films today must have a strong overseas component, and if those films have an anti - US message, that&#039;ll work out dandy for their P + L statements at the year - end accountings. Witness the success of American Beauty - modest box office domestically, huge box office internationally.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hollywood has always been self &#8211; referential, but the hagiographies that they presently give themselves have gone around the bend over the past decade. We always hear about the blending of art and commerce, but it&#8217;s really just about the commerce these days, and they know it.</p>
<p>Films today must have a strong overseas component, and if those films have an anti &#8211; US message, that&#8217;ll work out dandy for their P + L statements at the year &#8211; end accountings. Witness the success of American Beauty &#8211; modest box office domestically, huge box office internationally.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/comment-page-1/#comment-13916</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 19:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/#comment-13916</guid>
		<description>Rather, an entertainment industry focused on the status of its players rather than the desires of its audience...no surer way to get status than to play to the political prejudices of the big players...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rather, an entertainment industry focused on the status of its players rather than the desires of its audience&#8230;no surer way to get status than to play to the political prejudices of the big players&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/comment-page-1/#comment-13914</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 18:25:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/03/09/peggy-noonan-on-george-clooney/#comment-13914</guid>
		<description>....It would be nice to see them start to understand that rediscovering the work of, say, C.S. Lewis, and making a Narnia film, is not &quot;giving in&quot; to the audience but serving it...&quot;

What exactly does the phrase &quot;giving in to the audience&quot; mean? Do we have an entertainment industry that thinks it&#039;s an educational industry?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;.It would be nice to see them start to understand that rediscovering the work of, say, C.S. Lewis, and making a Narnia film, is not &#8220;giving in&#8221; to the audience but serving it&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>What exactly does the phrase &#8220;giving in to the audience&#8221; mean? Do we have an entertainment industry that thinks it&#8217;s an educational industry?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

