<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Need A New Punch Line</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/16/i-need-a-new-punch-line/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/16/i-need-a-new-punch-line/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/03/16/i-need-a-new-punch-line/comment-page-1/#comment-14316</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Mar 2006 02:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/03/16/i-need-a-new-punch-line/#comment-14316</guid>
		<description>Hamsher&#039;s silliness notwithstanding, I kinda-sorta understand the left wing hostility to Lieberman, at least theoretically. He&#039;s far from the biggest apostate Democrat in the Senate -- that honor would actually go to the Nelson twins of Nebraska and Florida, respectively. But where Nebraska is an overwhelmingly red state and Florida a somewhat reliable one, their apostacy is accepted as the price of getting a Democratic Senator elected in enemy territory. Senators from solid blue states like Connecticut, however, should be solid orthodox lefties.

And, really, what&#039;s the cost of challenging him? Lamont may be a nobody, but its not like the Republicans fielded a credible challenger to face the eventual winner. If Lieberman wins the nomination he&#039;ll cruise to a landslide victory in November -- possibly by an even greater margin than what he gets in the primaries. If Lamont wins, then the general election will pitch a resume-free Democrat versus a resume-free Republican in a state Kerry won by over eight points.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, I like Lieberman and admire his courage -- and if I lived in Connecticut I&#039;d probably even re-register Democrat to vote for him the primary. But the logic in trying to take him out is not lost on me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hamsher&#8217;s silliness notwithstanding, I kinda-sorta understand the left wing hostility to Lieberman, at least theoretically. He&#8217;s far from the biggest apostate Democrat in the Senate &#8212; that honor would actually go to the Nelson twins of Nebraska and Florida, respectively. But where Nebraska is an overwhelmingly red state and Florida a somewhat reliable one, their apostacy is accepted as the price of getting a Democratic Senator elected in enemy territory. Senators from solid blue states like Connecticut, however, should be solid orthodox lefties.</p>
<p>And, really, what&#8217;s the cost of challenging him? Lamont may be a nobody, but its not like the Republicans fielded a credible challenger to face the eventual winner. If Lieberman wins the nomination he&#8217;ll cruise to a landslide victory in November &#8212; possibly by an even greater margin than what he gets in the primaries. If Lamont wins, then the general election will pitch a resume-free Democrat versus a resume-free Republican in a state Kerry won by over eight points.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I like Lieberman and admire his courage &#8212; and if I lived in Connecticut I&#8217;d probably even re-register Democrat to vote for him the primary. But the logic in trying to take him out is not lost on me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

