<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Want To Lose In November? Forget Your Roots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15899</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Apr 2006 01:32:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15899</guid>
		<description>Well, one of the more obvious targets would be to start preventing US - based companies from incorporating themselves in other countries, those that specifically charge no corporate income tax on any profits. 

Many large corporations  - Microsoft being one recent example (in Ireland) - have done this little trick, thereby reaping the profits on their products sold here, while dodging most of the taxes by incorporating elsewhere. 

This is a disgraceful practice, and the fact that we all suffer for these types of actions make it imperative that this loophole be closed ASAP. 

Bill Gates - Time Man of the Year (What?).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, one of the more obvious targets would be to start preventing US &#8211; based companies from incorporating themselves in other countries, those that specifically charge no corporate income tax on any profits. </p>
<p>Many large corporations  &#8211; Microsoft being one recent example (in Ireland) &#8211; have done this little trick, thereby reaping the profits on their products sold here, while dodging most of the taxes by incorporating elsewhere. </p>
<p>This is a disgraceful practice, and the fact that we all suffer for these types of actions make it imperative that this loophole be closed ASAP. </p>
<p>Bill Gates &#8211; Time Man of the Year (What?).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15892</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 23:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15892</guid>
		<description>Sometime in the very near future I hope to offer my own suggestions in a post...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometime in the very near future I hope to offer my own suggestions in a post&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15889</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:56:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15889</guid>
		<description>It is easy to be a chest-thumper about fiscal responsibility, but when the hard choices have to be made, most people dodge the issues.  If you would like spending to be reduced, where should it be cut?  Military spending?  Veteran’s benefits?  Katrina relief?  Tsumani aid?  If you think that taxes should be raised, who should get the bill?

My own answer to these questions is that aside from some of the more egregious earmarks (e.g., the Bridges to Nowhere, etc.), there are not many places where spending can be cut substantially without causing undue harm.  The caveat is that I do not know enough about military spending to know if there is any slack there.

However, I think the government should raise taxes in three ways:  reexamine the tax credits which will go to oil companies; increase the tax on gasoline; and raise marginal tax rates on income, dividends, and capital gains.  The latter two would affect me personally, and I think those increases are equitable.  (My father once told me “may you always pay a lot of taxes.”)

Herman Talmadge said “don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that fellow behind the tree.”  I am eager to hear how those who complain about the fiscal irresponsibility of the Bush administration – as I do – would propose to solve the problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is easy to be a chest-thumper about fiscal responsibility, but when the hard choices have to be made, most people dodge the issues.  If you would like spending to be reduced, where should it be cut?  Military spending?  Veteran’s benefits?  Katrina relief?  Tsumani aid?  If you think that taxes should be raised, who should get the bill?</p>
<p>My own answer to these questions is that aside from some of the more egregious earmarks (e.g., the Bridges to Nowhere, etc.), there are not many places where spending can be cut substantially without causing undue harm.  The caveat is that I do not know enough about military spending to know if there is any slack there.</p>
<p>However, I think the government should raise taxes in three ways:  reexamine the tax credits which will go to oil companies; increase the tax on gasoline; and raise marginal tax rates on income, dividends, and capital gains.  The latter two would affect me personally, and I think those increases are equitable.  (My father once told me “may you always pay a lot of taxes.”)</p>
<p>Herman Talmadge said “don’t tax you, don’t tax me, tax that fellow behind the tree.”  I am eager to hear how those who complain about the fiscal irresponsibility of the Bush administration – as I do – would propose to solve the problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hokie Explorer</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15888</link>
		<dc:creator>Hokie Explorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 22:28:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15888</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d rather spend money on domestic social programs (like my education) than a never-ending quagmire on the other side of the planet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d rather spend money on domestic social programs (like my education) than a never-ending quagmire on the other side of the planet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megapotamus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15883</link>
		<dc:creator>megapotamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:58:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15883</guid>
		<description>With all the much justified griping we should remember that revenues are UP, not down due to the tax cuts... and up SHARPLY. Don&#039;t believe it? Look into it. Personally I&#039;m optimistic. This backlash, if it is that, is coming at just the right time. There is a sense of urgency and the PorkBusters, so maligned, are sticking to their guns. The WSJ is right on on the disgrace of the budget vote. We shall see if the lessons are sinking in. However, as many folks have observed, it would be better to have Democrats who are frank in their profligacy than Republicans who claim restraint and practice Byzantine levels of spending. Doubt either House will change hands but a close call would concentrate some minds. Not TOO close though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the much justified griping we should remember that revenues are UP, not down due to the tax cuts&#8230; and up SHARPLY. Don&#8217;t believe it? Look into it. Personally I&#8217;m optimistic. This backlash, if it is that, is coming at just the right time. There is a sense of urgency and the PorkBusters, so maligned, are sticking to their guns. The WSJ is right on on the disgrace of the budget vote. We shall see if the lessons are sinking in. However, as many folks have observed, it would be better to have Democrats who are frank in their profligacy than Republicans who claim restraint and practice Byzantine levels of spending. Doubt either House will change hands but a close call would concentrate some minds. Not TOO close though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15882</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 21:52:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15882</guid>
		<description>Ted Stevens should be given an honorable mention here, not only for the aforementioned bridge, but for so many other pork - barrel projects that have been funded for Alaska on his watch. He gives Robert Byrd a good run for the money in this regard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ted Stevens should be given an honorable mention here, not only for the aforementioned bridge, but for so many other pork &#8211; barrel projects that have been funded for Alaska on his watch. He gives Robert Byrd a good run for the money in this regard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr. K.</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15878</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr. K.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 20:25:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15878</guid>
		<description>Democrats are critisized as being &quot;tax and spend&quot; liberals, while the Bush administration has proved itself to be made up of &quot;cut taxes and spend&quot; republicans, resulting in a situation where there&#039;s no money to pay for all the handouts they think up. They have literally nothing for moderates.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Democrats are critisized as being &#8220;tax and spend&#8221; liberals, while the Bush administration has proved itself to be made up of &#8220;cut taxes and spend&#8221; republicans, resulting in a situation where there&#8217;s no money to pay for all the handouts they think up. They have literally nothing for moderates.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15862</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:38:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15862</guid>
		<description>No doubt about that. The problem is I see little to indicate the Democrats would spend any less. I find it very discouraging. Having the Democrats control Congress might not be the worst thing for spending, if only because the animosity between them and the administration might lead to gridlock, and at least when politicians can&#039;t agree on anything, they can&#039;t spend as much as they&#039;d like either.

Losing might also remind a few Republicans how they got to Washington in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No doubt about that. The problem is I see little to indicate the Democrats would spend any less. I find it very discouraging. Having the Democrats control Congress might not be the worst thing for spending, if only because the animosity between them and the administration might lead to gridlock, and at least when politicians can&#8217;t agree on anything, they can&#8217;t spend as much as they&#8217;d like either.</p>
<p>Losing might also remind a few Republicans how they got to Washington in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hokie Explorer</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/comment-page-1/#comment-15855</link>
		<dc:creator>Hokie Explorer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Apr 2006 16:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/13/want-to-lose-in-november-forget-your-roots/#comment-15855</guid>
		<description>At this point, the Republican party is no longer the fiscally responsible party.  In fact, I&#039;d say they waste just as much if not more money than the Democratic party.  My favorites are all of these pork-barrel projects like the Bridge to Nowhere.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At this point, the Republican party is no longer the fiscally responsible party.  In fact, I&#8217;d say they waste just as much if not more money than the Democratic party.  My favorites are all of these pork-barrel projects like the Bridge to Nowhere.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

