<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Get A Few Things Straight About Leaking</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Question Before The Court</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-20908</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Question Before The Court</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 04:09:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/#comment-20908</guid>
		<description>[...] We know (don&#8217;t we?) that current CIA employs cannot legally leak classified information&#8230;what about ex-CIA? The question has relevance, because some, including&#8230;ahem&#8230;myself, have suggested that whistleblowers like Mary McCarthy should quit their positions prior to talking to the press if their conscience forces them to take action against something they see as morally objectionable. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] We know (don&#8217;t we?) that current CIA employs cannot legally leak classified information&#8230;what about ex-CIA? The question has relevance, because some, including&#8230;ahem&#8230;myself, have suggested that whistleblowers like Mary McCarthy should quit their positions prior to talking to the press if their conscience forces them to take action against something they see as morally objectionable. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sister Toldjah</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-20749</link>
		<dc:creator>Sister Toldjah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:35:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/#comment-20749</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;6 degrees of Mary McCarthy&lt;/strong&gt;

If you&#8217;re familiar with the game &#8220;6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon&#8221; you&#8217;ll know what I mean with the above post title. 
The object of the game is to, as MSNBC describes it, &#8220;connect Bacon and any other actor through the films or t...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>6 degrees of Mary McCarthy</strong></p>
<p>If you&#8217;re familiar with the game &#8220;6 Degrees of Kevin Bacon&#8221; you&#8217;ll know what I mean with the above post title.<br />
The object of the game is to, as MSNBC describes it, &#8220;connect Bacon and any other actor through the films or t&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-19788</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/#comment-19788</guid>
		<description>The short answer is I don&#039;t know 100% the CIA rules for ex-CIA speaking to reporters.  Certainly they must vet all &lt;i&gt;manuscripts&lt;/i&gt;, as explained in this &lt;a href=&quot;http://archives.cjr.org/year/01/4/wolper.asp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this 5 year piece in the CJR &lt;/a&gt;featuring, intriguingly, James Risen.

If I have time, I&#039;ll do some more Googling and share anything interesting that comes up...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The short answer is I don&#8217;t know 100% the CIA rules for ex-CIA speaking to reporters.  Certainly they must vet all <i>manuscripts</i>, as explained in this <a href="http://archives.cjr.org/year/01/4/wolper.asp" rel="nofollow">this 5 year piece in the CJR </a>featuring, intriguingly, James Risen.</p>
<p>If I have time, I&#8217;ll do some more Googling and share anything interesting that comes up&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous Liberal</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/comment-page-1/#comment-19672</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 02:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/04/25/lets-get-one-thing-straight-about-leaking/#comment-19672</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure option (C) is really an option.  I don&#039;t think quitting your job frees you to release classified information that you learned about through your employment.  If that were true, former CIA types wouldn&#039;t have to get their books cleared by the CIA before publication.  

So let&#039;s assume, hypothetically, that you&#039;ve discovered serious government wrongdoing, you&#039;ve gone through all official channels to raise your concerns, and everyone is ignoring you.  What do you do then?  You can quit in protest.  But I don&#039;t think doing so frees you to discuss classified information.  I think you&#039;re still subject to prosecution if you reveal it.  So what then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure option (C) is really an option.  I don&#8217;t think quitting your job frees you to release classified information that you learned about through your employment.  If that were true, former CIA types wouldn&#8217;t have to get their books cleared by the CIA before publication.  </p>
<p>So let&#8217;s assume, hypothetically, that you&#8217;ve discovered serious government wrongdoing, you&#8217;ve gone through all official channels to raise your concerns, and everyone is ignoring you.  What do you do then?  You can quit in protest.  But I don&#8217;t think doing so frees you to discuss classified information.  I think you&#8217;re still subject to prosecution if you reveal it.  So what then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

