<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: To My Readers&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/03/to-my-readers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/03/to-my-readers/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/03/to-my-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-23371</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 15:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/03/to-my-readers/#comment-23371</guid>
		<description>Quote away, Mark. And I also will not bust your chops over spelling or grammar.

I always link when I can and it does feel strange when I can&#039;t, but after thinking about it, it seems that providing the link is not really part of crediting the source anyway. 

It&#039;s just become second nature for bloggers to provide the hyperlink.  If the &lt;i&gt;Times&lt;/i&gt; wants to take away that blogging convenience, it&#039;s not our fault.  

I just credit the source in the old fashioned way, and roll on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quote away, Mark. And I also will not bust your chops over spelling or grammar.</p>
<p>I always link when I can and it does feel strange when I can&#8217;t, but after thinking about it, it seems that providing the link is not really part of crediting the source anyway. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s just become second nature for bloggers to provide the hyperlink.  If the <i>Times</i> wants to take away that blogging convenience, it&#8217;s not our fault.  </p>
<p>I just credit the source in the old fashioned way, and roll on.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/03/to-my-readers/comment-page-1/#comment-23315</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 00:23:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/03/to-my-readers/#comment-23315</guid>
		<description>After their recent annual shareholder&#039;s meeting, you probably won&#039;t have to wait too long to get that information free and clear again. It looks very bad right now - and when Morgan Stanley (a significant minority shareholder) is making noises about taking them private, well, you do the math. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/19/business/media/19times.html?ex=1303099200&amp;en=e8c7efe2bf72ba71&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss

Shareholders withheld 28% of their votes for the current board of directors. Yikes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After their recent annual shareholder&#8217;s meeting, you probably won&#8217;t have to wait too long to get that information free and clear again. It looks very bad right now &#8211; and when Morgan Stanley (a significant minority shareholder) is making noises about taking them private, well, you do the math. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/19/business/media/19times.html?ex=1303099200&amp;en=e8c7efe2bf72ba71&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss" rel="nofollow">http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/19/business/media/19times.html?ex=1303099200&amp;en=e8c7efe2bf72ba71&amp;ei=5090&amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;emc=rss</a></p>
<p>Shareholders withheld 28% of their votes for the current board of directors. Yikes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

