<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Note For Government Terrorist Trackers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/comment-page-1/#comment-23996</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 04:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/#comment-23996</guid>
		<description>Given that the other phone companies have just exposed themselves to millions of dollars in legal claims, it sounds like Qwest was the only one of the bunch with any sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that the other phone companies have just exposed themselves to millions of dollars in legal claims, it sounds like Qwest was the only one of the bunch with any sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/comment-page-1/#comment-23989</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 May 2006 01:45:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/#comment-23989</guid>
		<description>Dude, what about people who just believe in the concept of personal liberty?  Are they terrorists, and thus should be subject to government searches and such?  Just because they want to subscribe to a telecom company that doesn&#039;t sell their information to the highest bidder?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude, what about people who just believe in the concept of personal liberty?  Are they terrorists, and thus should be subject to government searches and such?  Just because they want to subscribe to a telecom company that doesn&#8217;t sell their information to the highest bidder?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSA Phone Pattern Analysis Update</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/comment-page-1/#comment-23977</link>
		<dc:creator>The Strata-Sphere &#187; Blog Archive &#187; NSA Phone Pattern Analysis Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 May 2006 22:53:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/11/a-note-for-government-terrorist-trackers/#comment-23977</guid>
		<description>[...] That much is clear, the two topics are slightly different, and therefore this second leak is particularly egregious. While I am adjusting my view on the specific details, I am not changing my position this was an incredibly dangerous leak. The details about Qwest not participating was horrendous and put Qwest and its customers in a terrible situation. Contrary to the liberal mutterings I am not pushing on Qwest one way or the other. The leak is what is disturbing. And Qwest could pay a terrible price. I know enough right now to move all communications I want hidden from federal scrutiny to Qwest - ASAP. I also know now that running an operation which I want undetected by the Feds has a better chance of being hidden in the Qwest service area. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] That much is clear, the two topics are slightly different, and therefore this second leak is particularly egregious. While I am adjusting my view on the specific details, I am not changing my position this was an incredibly dangerous leak. The details about Qwest not participating was horrendous and put Qwest and its customers in a terrible situation. Contrary to the liberal mutterings I am not pushing on Qwest one way or the other. The leak is what is disturbing. And Qwest could pay a terrible price. I know enough right now to move all communications I want hidden from federal scrutiny to Qwest &#8211; ASAP. I also know now that running an operation which I want undetected by the Feds has a better chance of being hidden in the Qwest service area. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
