<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The War of the Polls</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikebdot</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-24663</link>
		<dc:creator>mikebdot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 May 2006 18:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/#comment-24663</guid>
		<description>Aaron, the link you provided are just 10 plots that were foiled, but not necessarily because of the NSA program.  Liberal oasis (did you read the link?) said that none have been confirmed because it&#039;s &quot;classified&quot;.  My point was that if it was confirmed that plots had been foiled because of the program the media coverage might be more friendly (like with the meth lab stories).  Not trying to say anything further.

I am a moderate.  I dislike both conservative and liberal talking heads, but tend to vote for democrats because I value privacy over money.  I can always make more money if needed, but I would be perfectly content paying an additional $2-4K per year (which is probably the difference between Kerry and Bush, even though I&#039;m now paying an additional $1-2K/year since interest rates on college loans have increased and you know as well as I how much Rose-Hulman sticks it to you, or maybe you won&#039;t be paying for it like I was forced to...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, the link you provided are just 10 plots that were foiled, but not necessarily because of the NSA program.  Liberal oasis (did you read the link?) said that none have been confirmed because it&#8217;s &#8220;classified&#8221;.  My point was that if it was confirmed that plots had been foiled because of the program the media coverage might be more friendly (like with the meth lab stories).  Not trying to say anything further.</p>
<p>I am a moderate.  I dislike both conservative and liberal talking heads, but tend to vote for democrats because I value privacy over money.  I can always make more money if needed, but I would be perfectly content paying an additional $2-4K per year (which is probably the difference between Kerry and Bush, even though I&#8217;m now paying an additional $1-2K/year since interest rates on college loans have increased and you know as well as I how much Rose-Hulman sticks it to you, or maybe you won&#8217;t be paying for it like I was forced to&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-24311</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 00:30:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/#comment-24311</guid>
		<description>No attacks foiled at all? Really? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/02/09/whitehouse.plots/index.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CNN&lt;/a&gt; says there are 10. I&#039;d say that&#039;s probably a more reliable source than &quot;liberal oasis.&quot; And perhaps I&#039;m remembering this incorrectly, mike, but didn&#039;t you say you were a moderate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No attacks foiled at all? Really? <a href="http://www.cnn.com/2006/US/02/09/whitehouse.plots/index.html" rel="nofollow">CNN</a> says there are 10. I&#8217;d say that&#8217;s probably a more reliable source than &#8220;liberal oasis.&#8221; And perhaps I&#8217;m remembering this incorrectly, mike, but didn&#8217;t you say you were a moderate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neo</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-24260</link>
		<dc:creator>Neo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/#comment-24260</guid>
		<description>Based on these two links, I&#039;d say that the latest NSA program is quite legal, well at least if they buy them, like everybody else.

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them&lt;/a&gt;

This would render these polls, this issue, moot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on these two links, I&#8217;d say that the latest NSA program is quite legal, well at least if they buy them, like everybody else.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.suntimes.com/output/news/cst-nws-privacy05.html</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them" rel="nofollow">http://www.democrats.com/spy-on-them</a></p>
<p>This would render these polls, this issue, moot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikebdot</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/comment-page-1/#comment-24258</link>
		<dc:creator>mikebdot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 May 2006 13:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/14/the-war-of-the-polls/#comment-24258</guid>
		<description>What is the difference between making a list of calls people make in an effort to find patterns to stop terrorism and making a list of people who buy certain cold/sinus medicines at their local pharmacy in an effort to find patterns for people who are making meth?  The negative media attention for the NSA records far outweighs that of the meth issue (most reporting I&#039;ve seen has been positive on collecting those records, especially when people are caught), so, why the dichotomy?  Might be because there haven&#039;t been any terrorists with foiled plans making it into the news...&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liberaloasis.com/archives/051406.htm#051506&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;or none at all?&lt;/a&gt;  Damn classified programs...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the difference between making a list of calls people make in an effort to find patterns to stop terrorism and making a list of people who buy certain cold/sinus medicines at their local pharmacy in an effort to find patterns for people who are making meth?  The negative media attention for the NSA records far outweighs that of the meth issue (most reporting I&#8217;ve seen has been positive on collecting those records, especially when people are caught), so, why the dichotomy?  Might be because there haven&#8217;t been any terrorists with foiled plans making it into the news&#8230;<a href="http://www.liberaloasis.com/archives/051406.htm#051506" rel="nofollow">or none at all?</a>  Damn classified programs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

