<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The President&#8217;s Immigration Proposal: Sensible Security</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Immigration to Canada</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-69472</link>
		<dc:creator>Immigration to Canada</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jul 2006 23:13:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-69472</guid>
		<description>I hope it really helps both, immigrants and non-immigrants. Cheers! Alex B.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope it really helps both, immigrants and non-immigrants. Cheers! Alex B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CC Coleman</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-29376</link>
		<dc:creator>CC Coleman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 May 2006 01:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-29376</guid>
		<description>Bush is the biggest disappointment in politics I&#039;ve seen yet.  

What a flaming RINO!  

I can&#039;t wait for the Demo-Rats to begin Impeachment Hearings on him and I&#039;ll support them.  

They will want to burn him for the &quot;WAR...&quot; 

... and I&#039;ll cheer them along for his sellout of the American people on Immigration!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush is the biggest disappointment in politics I&#8217;ve seen yet.  </p>
<p>What a flaming RINO!  </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait for the Demo-Rats to begin Impeachment Hearings on him and I&#8217;ll support them.  </p>
<p>They will want to burn him for the &#8220;WAR&#8230;&#8221; </p>
<p>&#8230; and I&#8217;ll cheer them along for his sellout of the American people on Immigration!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-28102</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 May 2006 22:50:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-28102</guid>
		<description>Hi I don&#039;t know about this whole ball games but if it about taking illegal mexican out of our country then let me get this straight whether or not the mexican will still be coming anyways reason why I say this is because it been going on for decade and not change .. Plus our own government isn&#039;t having eyes open and being so damn puzzle of what the heck going on let me tell you . This is going to be dirty and ugly as far as putting military on the border.. What best is to have the fence then let them come in legally then get in to the american dream land but if our government and other sayin hell no then there is a big racist going on here so understand we all are human so have some common sense about civil right and respect all kind and gender and national ethics... MR Bush you got the ball games upside down where is freedom and respect?? Oh not to mention what is Minutemen is that some kind of supremecy group or something?? Well hope we all have our dream come true as lady of liberty and FREEDOM</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I don&#8217;t know about this whole ball games but if it about taking illegal mexican out of our country then let me get this straight whether or not the mexican will still be coming anyways reason why I say this is because it been going on for decade and not change .. Plus our own government isn&#8217;t having eyes open and being so damn puzzle of what the heck going on let me tell you . This is going to be dirty and ugly as far as putting military on the border.. What best is to have the fence then let them come in legally then get in to the american dream land but if our government and other sayin hell no then there is a big racist going on here so understand we all are human so have some common sense about civil right and respect all kind and gender and national ethics&#8230; MR Bush you got the ball games upside down where is freedom and respect?? Oh not to mention what is Minutemen is that some kind of supremecy group or something?? Well hope we all have our dream come true as lady of liberty and FREEDOM</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polimom Says &#187; Pulling the (wingnut) weeds</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-24390</link>
		<dc:creator>Polimom Says &#187; Pulling the (wingnut) weeds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 17:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-24390</guid>
		<description>[...] And from Decision &#8216;08 comes this: I missed the live coverage, but Iâ€™ve read the content, and I must say I the Presidentâ€™s immigration speech hit just about every note I wanted to hear. He talked about concrete steps to stop the flow of illegal immigration, but stopped short of being draconian; he talked of needed steps to end â€˜catch and releaseâ€™; he talked of the welcoming spirit we must have for immigrants who play by the rules; and he resisted calls to round up 11 million people and drag â€˜em away in front of the whole world (and for those who support the mass deportation of all existing illegals, I donâ€™t think youâ€™ve seriously considered the images - it would be brutal). [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And from Decision &#8216;08 comes this: I missed the live coverage, but Iâ€™ve read the content, and I must say I the Presidentâ€™s immigration speech hit just about every note I wanted to hear. He talked about concrete steps to stop the flow of illegal immigration, but stopped short of being draconian; he talked of needed steps to end â€˜catch and releaseâ€™; he talked of the welcoming spirit we must have for immigrants who play by the rules; and he resisted calls to round up 11 million people and drag â€˜em away in front of the whole world (and for those who support the mass deportation of all existing illegals, I donâ€™t think youâ€™ve seriously considered the images &#8211; it would be brutal). [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dadmanly</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-24380</link>
		<dc:creator>Dadmanly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 15:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-24380</guid>
		<description></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The President on Immigration</strong></p>
<p>The President gave his speech on immigration last night, and effectively charted out what is being widely described as the “middle ground.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. Longren</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-24379</link>
		<dc:creator>T. Longren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 15:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-24379</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bush: No Amnesty, No Mass Deportation&lt;/strong&gt;

I was impressed with President Bush&#8217;s speech lastnight.  He did&#8217;t get out of it though without looking like a jackass, thanks to CNN.  CNN cut to his rehersal speech for some reason, Bush was in mid-sentence then stopped to look over at an ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bush: No Amnesty, No Mass Deportation</strong></p>
<p>I was impressed with President Bush&#8217;s speech lastnight.  He did&#8217;t get out of it though without looking like a jackass, thanks to CNN.  CNN cut to his rehersal speech for some reason, Bush was in mid-sentence then stopped to look over at an &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-24378</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 15:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-24378</guid>
		<description>Well, dmac, a wall is attractive - but I&#039;m not sure (I admit I&#039;m no expert) that it is feasible along the ENTIRE border.  I know Bush did mention &#039;high-tech fences in urban corridors&#039;, for what it&#039;s worth...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, dmac, a wall is attractive &#8211; but I&#8217;m not sure (I admit I&#8217;m no expert) that it is feasible along the ENTIRE border.  I know Bush did mention &#8216;high-tech fences in urban corridors&#8217;, for what it&#8217;s worth&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-24376</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 15:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-24376</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t believe that all of the conservatives who are upset are necessarily out of line on this one -Bush seems to be entirely deaf to their concerns about actually having an enforceable border. You need a wall to do that (for starters) - what&#039;s the problem with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t believe that all of the conservatives who are upset are necessarily out of line on this one -Bush seems to be entirely deaf to their concerns about actually having an enforceable border. You need a wall to do that (for starters) &#8211; what&#8217;s the problem with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Diggers Realm</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-24348</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggers Realm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 07:56:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-24348</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;The Whole Truth About The Presidential Address On Immigration: What It Does And Doesn&#039;t Say&lt;/strong&gt;

To sum up my reaction to President Bush&#039;s presidential address on immigration in one word it would have to be bullsh**. This is the only presidential address that President Bush has made on immigration. Let&#039;s go through his points --...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Whole Truth About The Presidential Address On Immigration: What It Does And Doesn&#8217;t Say</strong></p>
<p>To sum up my reaction to President Bush&#8217;s presidential address on immigration in one word it would have to be bullsh**. This is the only presidential address that President Bush has made on immigration. Let&#8217;s go through his points &#8211;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Jacobsen</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/comment-page-1/#comment-24336</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Jacobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 May 2006 05:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/15/the-presidents-immigration-proposal-sensible-security/#comment-24336</guid>
		<description>You know guys the reason people are so upset is because this is a carbon copy replay, nobody particularly enjoys being robbed the same way twice.  You use words like realistic and pragmatic do describe a fundamental injustice.

We accepted the 86 amnesty predicated on enforcement that never came.  President Bush has made precisely the same deal.  Wall?  He never mentioned an actual wall tonight, he talked of a &quot;high tech&quot; wall that has already been tried and failed on the Canadian border.

Guard troops on the border?  They can be removed.  Not to mention the presidents chat with Vincente Fox on Sunday evening where he assured our good friend Vincente that he had no real desire to enforce the border.

My question to you is very, very simple.  All the tools the president required to deal with the problem of illegal immigration and a porous border have been at his disposal for the last five years.  Why hasn&#039;t he done anything?  Moreover, why is workplace enforcement down 95%?

Why did workplace enforcement only happen the week before the president thought he would get his bill, why troops on the border now?

Why is the president holding border security and enforcement hostage to his guest worker/amnesty program?

Could it be he has absolutely no intention of doing real enforcement?  That&#039;s where my money is, and seeing as it has quite a bit of historical precedent I feel pretty comfortable with that position.

This is a despicable scam, I used to think well of this president I voted for twice.  Now I hold him in a similar regard to Bill Clinton, not because he isn&#039;t doing what I want him to do, but because he is lying to me while trying to do something he knows I won&#039;t accept.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know guys the reason people are so upset is because this is a carbon copy replay, nobody particularly enjoys being robbed the same way twice.  You use words like realistic and pragmatic do describe a fundamental injustice.</p>
<p>We accepted the 86 amnesty predicated on enforcement that never came.  President Bush has made precisely the same deal.  Wall?  He never mentioned an actual wall tonight, he talked of a &#8220;high tech&#8221; wall that has already been tried and failed on the Canadian border.</p>
<p>Guard troops on the border?  They can be removed.  Not to mention the presidents chat with Vincente Fox on Sunday evening where he assured our good friend Vincente that he had no real desire to enforce the border.</p>
<p>My question to you is very, very simple.  All the tools the president required to deal with the problem of illegal immigration and a porous border have been at his disposal for the last five years.  Why hasn&#8217;t he done anything?  Moreover, why is workplace enforcement down 95%?</p>
<p>Why did workplace enforcement only happen the week before the president thought he would get his bill, why troops on the border now?</p>
<p>Why is the president holding border security and enforcement hostage to his guest worker/amnesty program?</p>
<p>Could it be he has absolutely no intention of doing real enforcement?  That&#8217;s where my money is, and seeing as it has quite a bit of historical precedent I feel pretty comfortable with that position.</p>
<p>This is a despicable scam, I used to think well of this president I voted for twice.  Now I hold him in a similar regard to Bill Clinton, not because he isn&#8217;t doing what I want him to do, but because he is lying to me while trying to do something he knows I won&#8217;t accept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

