<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Meese On Immigration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Diggers Realm</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-31887</link>
		<dc:creator>Diggers Realm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 May 2006 08:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/#comment-31887</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Reagan&#039;s Attorney General, Ed Meese, Says Amnesty Then And Now A Failure&lt;/strong&gt;

Ed Meese, the attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, supported the 1986 amnesty that was passed. Now he says things today look similar and the amnesty that he supported in 1986 was a mistake and utter failure. We&#039;re doomed to...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reagan&#8217;s Attorney General, Ed Meese, Says Amnesty Then And Now A Failure</strong></p>
<p>Ed Meese, the attorney general under President Ronald Reagan, supported the 1986 amnesty that was passed. Now he says things today look similar and the amnesty that he supported in 1986 was a mistake and utter failure. We&#8217;re doomed to&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-31520</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 21:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/#comment-31520</guid>
		<description>&quot;That would be Humboldt Park in Chicago.&quot; 

Or Logan Square - or Pilsen. My own neighborhood used to be heavily Hispanic, but has changed due to regentrification - more&#039;s the pity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;That would be Humboldt Park in Chicago.&#8221; </p>
<p>Or Logan Square &#8211; or Pilsen. My own neighborhood used to be heavily Hispanic, but has changed due to regentrification &#8211; more&#8217;s the pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-31511</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 19:10:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/#comment-31511</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I live in Austin...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I live in Austin&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-31510</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 19:10:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/#comment-31510</guid>
		<description>Jake, there&#039;s no silver bullet for number three - it&#039;s more a carrot than a stick approach.  To quote &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1022.cfm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Stephen Johnson&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;em&gt;In daily relations, public diplomacy, and development policies toward Latin America, the U.S. government must do a better job of urging hemispheric neighbors to liberalize economies, untangle and cut burdensome business regulations, and ensure equal treatment of all citizens under the law to spread prosperity more broadly.

Mexico has already gone partway under Fox, but it must continue these efforts to account for the needs of its expanding population. Candidates running for the Mexican presidency and congress this year should hear from U.S. officials that backsliding toward populism will limit economic opportunities for their own workers and create friction between our two nations.&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, there&#8217;s no silver bullet for number three &#8211; it&#8217;s more a carrot than a stick approach.  To quote <a href="http://www.heritage.org/Research/Immigration/wm1022.cfm" rel="nofollow">Stephen Johnson</a>:</p>
<p><em>In daily relations, public diplomacy, and development policies toward Latin America, the U.S. government must do a better job of urging hemispheric neighbors to liberalize economies, untangle and cut burdensome business regulations, and ensure equal treatment of all citizens under the law to spread prosperity more broadly.</p>
<p>Mexico has already gone partway under Fox, but it must continue these efforts to account for the needs of its expanding population. Candidates running for the Mexican presidency and congress this year should hear from U.S. officials that backsliding toward populism will limit economic opportunities for their own workers and create friction between our two nations.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jake Jacobsen</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-31509</link>
		<dc:creator>Jake Jacobsen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 19:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/#comment-31509</guid>
		<description>I have no problem with your plan except #3.  Can you go into any detail how we would achieve this realistically?  Wasn&#039;t NAFTA supposed to accomplish this? And how do you see overcoming the very real barrier of corruption that animates Mexican society?

Oh, as to immigration issues being overblown?  Just curious, where do you live, why don&#039;t you spend a week in my neighborhood.  That would be Humboldt Park in Chicago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no problem with your plan except #3.  Can you go into any detail how we would achieve this realistically?  Wasn&#8217;t NAFTA supposed to accomplish this? And how do you see overcoming the very real barrier of corruption that animates Mexican society?</p>
<p>Oh, as to immigration issues being overblown?  Just curious, where do you live, why don&#8217;t you spend a week in my neighborhood.  That would be Humboldt Park in Chicago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikebdot</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/comment-page-1/#comment-31506</link>
		<dc:creator>mikebdot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 May 2006 18:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/05/24/meese-on-immigration/#comment-31506</guid>
		<description>I agree completely with this course of action.  One thing I would like to see is that if the immigrants are allowed to stay, there should be some sort of motivation to rat out their employers.  Perhaps their fine could be lessened while the company/individuals responsible for the hiring should be fined even more heavily.  I don&#039;t see why we shouldn&#039;t get as much money out of this as we can.  It would probably pay for the tax cuts for a number of years...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree completely with this course of action.  One thing I would like to see is that if the immigrants are allowed to stay, there should be some sort of motivation to rat out their employers.  Perhaps their fine could be lessened while the company/individuals responsible for the hiring should be fined even more heavily.  I don&#8217;t see why we shouldn&#8217;t get as much money out of this as we can.  It would probably pay for the tax cuts for a number of years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
