<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Nutroots® Celebrate Another Moral Victory</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42660</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 04:07:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42660</guid>
		<description>Ugly &amp; Mark:  Turnout was a bit south of 30 per cent of registered voters statewide, although it theoretically may have been higher in San Diego given the high profile of this race.

Also, looking at raw votes the primary candidates received (California is a closed primary state), it is pretty clear that the Democrats showed up in greater numbers than their percentage of the statewide electorate, probably for exactly the reasons Ugly American noted.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ugly &amp; Mark:  Turnout was a bit south of 30 per cent of registered voters statewide, although it theoretically may have been higher in San Diego given the high profile of this race.</p>
<p>Also, looking at raw votes the primary candidates received (California is a closed primary state), it is pretty clear that the Democrats showed up in greater numbers than their percentage of the statewide electorate, probably for exactly the reasons Ugly American noted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On California&#8217;s 50th, Kos And I See Eye-To-Eye</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42484</link>
		<dc:creator>Decision &#8216;08 &#187; Blog Archive &#187; On California&#8217;s 50th, Kos And I See Eye-To-Eye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42484</guid>
		<description>[...] Me, earlier today: &#8230;[T]his is the very district vacated by Duke Cunningham. Nowhere is ‘the culture of corruption’ meme going to be stronger than here - and it wasn’t enough. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Me, earlier today: &#8230;[T]his is the very district vacated by Duke Cunningham. Nowhere is ‘the culture of corruption’ meme going to be stronger than here &#8211; and it wasn’t enough. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: topsecretk9</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42481</link>
		<dc:creator>topsecretk9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42481</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://forum.truthout.org/blog/story/2006/6/7/94312/84649&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;This is pretty funny:&lt;/a&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Report From the 50th
By Marc Ash,

Wed Jun 7th, 2006 at 09:43:12 AM EDT :: Midterms 2006 

In addition to being Truthout&#039;s Executive Director, I also happen to live in California&#039;s 50th Congressional district. First, let me say that Francine Busby did VERY well by local standards. Let me also say that she got the support of a lot of local Republicans to do it.

One factor that helped Billbray was the highly televised massive immigration demonstrations - particularly in Los Angeles. That played directly into Billbray&#039;s appeal to the fears of local white voters.

Some national news services are spinning this as an indicator of things to come in November. Sure, if the Republicans can focus all of their resources in one wealthy, heavily Republican (nearly 2-1) enclave 60 miles from the Mexican border, then they will do well in November. But if they have to compete in districts where the pre-existing balance is not massively tilted in their favor, and losing large numbers of disaffected Republicans will matter, then they&#039;ll probably need a new war on someone to hold power.

&lt;strong&gt;You can believe that,&lt;/strong&gt; if Republican voters nationwide express the same discontentment in November that they expressed here, &lt;strong&gt;you&#039;re looking at a Democratic landslide in November.&lt;/strong&gt;

&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Of course this is the same guy sticking by his exclusive explosive Karl Rove indictment that apparently happened a month ago. He wrote this recent update:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Continued Interest in the Rove Indictment Story
By Marc Ash,

Sat Jun 3rd, 2006 at 09:08:26 AM EDT :: Fitzgerald Investigation 
(321 comments)

We are still getting a high volume of email inquiries on our Rove indictment story from May 13, 2006. We greatly appreciate your interest, and are well aware of the right of all Americans to know what is happening here.

So again, for the record: We stand by the story. TO&#039;s staff is treating this story as our highest priority and will be following up with additional information as it becomes available.

Clearly the question is: &quot;If Karl Rove has been indicted, why has there been no official announcement?&quot; Right now we have only general indicators as to why an announcement might not be made when an indictment has been returned. And even though these indicators do exist, we need to more clearly understand exactly what is happening in this case before we can report on them.

This a unique situation, and frankly a stressful one. We would like to thank all of those who have offered their support during the course of this ordeal. We fully intend to press on.

Marc Ash, Executive Director - t r u t h o u t &lt;/blockquote&gt;


Delusion, you just can&#039;t make up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://forum.truthout.org/blog/story/2006/6/7/94312/84649" rel="nofollow">This is pretty funny:</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Report From the 50th<br />
By Marc Ash,</p>
<p>Wed Jun 7th, 2006 at 09:43:12 AM EDT :: Midterms 2006 </p>
<p>In addition to being Truthout&#8217;s Executive Director, I also happen to live in California&#8217;s 50th Congressional district. First, let me say that Francine Busby did VERY well by local standards. Let me also say that she got the support of a lot of local Republicans to do it.</p>
<p>One factor that helped Billbray was the highly televised massive immigration demonstrations &#8211; particularly in Los Angeles. That played directly into Billbray&#8217;s appeal to the fears of local white voters.</p>
<p>Some national news services are spinning this as an indicator of things to come in November. Sure, if the Republicans can focus all of their resources in one wealthy, heavily Republican (nearly 2-1) enclave 60 miles from the Mexican border, then they will do well in November. But if they have to compete in districts where the pre-existing balance is not massively tilted in their favor, and losing large numbers of disaffected Republicans will matter, then they&#8217;ll probably need a new war on someone to hold power.</p>
<p><strong>You can believe that,</strong> if Republican voters nationwide express the same discontentment in November that they expressed here, <strong>you&#8217;re looking at a Democratic landslide in November.</strong></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Of course this is the same guy sticking by his exclusive explosive Karl Rove indictment that apparently happened a month ago. He wrote this recent update:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Continued Interest in the Rove Indictment Story<br />
By Marc Ash,</p>
<p>Sat Jun 3rd, 2006 at 09:08:26 AM EDT :: Fitzgerald Investigation<br />
(321 comments)</p>
<p>We are still getting a high volume of email inquiries on our Rove indictment story from May 13, 2006. We greatly appreciate your interest, and are well aware of the right of all Americans to know what is happening here.</p>
<p>So again, for the record: We stand by the story. TO&#8217;s staff is treating this story as our highest priority and will be following up with additional information as it becomes available.</p>
<p>Clearly the question is: &#8220;If Karl Rove has been indicted, why has there been no official announcement?&#8221; Right now we have only general indicators as to why an announcement might not be made when an indictment has been returned. And even though these indicators do exist, we need to more clearly understand exactly what is happening in this case before we can report on them.</p>
<p>This a unique situation, and frankly a stressful one. We would like to thank all of those who have offered their support during the course of this ordeal. We fully intend to press on.</p>
<p>Marc Ash, Executive Director &#8211; t r u t h o u t </p></blockquote>
<p>Delusion, you just can&#8217;t make up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pros and Cons &#187; Alabama had primary elections today.</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42467</link>
		<dc:creator>Pros and Cons &#187; Alabama had primary elections today.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 19:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42467</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Here&#8217;s a roundup of others blogging as of 2:00 Central on Wednesday. Decision &#8216;08 on California&#8217;s District 50, and again, this time with feeling! For one of his earlier, accurate prognositcations on the same race, click here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Here&#8217;s a roundup of others blogging as of 2:00 Central on Wednesday. Decision &#8216;08 on California&#8217;s District 50, and again, this time with feeling! For one of his earlier, accurate prognositcations on the same race, click here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42428</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42428</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve been looking for the numbers, unsuccessfully, but a number of articles have said it was low...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been looking for the numbers, unsuccessfully, but a number of articles have said it was low&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Ugly American</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42408</link>
		<dc:creator>The Ugly American</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42408</guid>
		<description>by the way Brian Bilbray is no world beater. He is certainly not the best the GOP has to offer and he still won by 4.5% in a special election where the Dems were having a primary for their gubernatorial candidate and a Dem pet project prop 82 (pre school for all for free by taxing the rich) and the GOP had nothing else but this district election to show up for. 

Does anyone have the turn out numbers? I would bet it was very very low, and that more than anything is why this race was close. 

In politics there is no such thing as a moral victory. You either win or you loose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>by the way Brian Bilbray is no world beater. He is certainly not the best the GOP has to offer and he still won by 4.5% in a special election where the Dems were having a primary for their gubernatorial candidate and a Dem pet project prop 82 (pre school for all for free by taxing the rich) and the GOP had nothing else but this district election to show up for. </p>
<p>Does anyone have the turn out numbers? I would bet it was very very low, and that more than anything is why this race was close. </p>
<p>In politics there is no such thing as a moral victory. You either win or you loose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Environmental Republican</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42393</link>
		<dc:creator>Environmental Republican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 17:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42393</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;A Loss is a Win in Donkland&lt;/strong&gt;

If Bowers wishes to claim moral victories, that&#039;s surely his prerogative. If he was as astute as he thinks he is, he may want to take a step back and look at what this means with regard to the November elections and the Donks chances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>A Loss is a Win in Donkland</strong></p>
<p>If Bowers wishes to claim moral victories, that&#8217;s surely his prerogative. If he was as astute as he thinks he is, he may want to take a step back and look at what this means with regard to the November elections and the Donks chances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yesterday&#8217;s Election</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42381</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Yesterday&#8217;s Election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42381</guid>
		<description>[...] Decision &#039;08 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Decision &#39;08 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42379</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42379</guid>
		<description>If coolness requires you can&#039;t enjoy Monty Python, sign me up for Dork Camp.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If coolness requires you can&#8217;t enjoy Monty Python, sign me up for Dork Camp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-42377</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jun 2006 16:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/07/nutroots%c2%ae-celebrate-another-symbolic-victory/#comment-42377</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;he Dead Parrot is also instructive with the Lefty barkers standing in for Michael Palin and the Dems for the bird. That makes me John Cleese.&lt;/i&gt;

Doesn&#039;t talking about who would be what in political versions of Monty Python just make you a giant dork?  Squared?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>he Dead Parrot is also instructive with the Lefty barkers standing in for Michael Palin and the Dems for the bird. That makes me John Cleese.</i></p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t talking about who would be what in political versions of Monty Python just make you a giant dork?  Squared?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

