<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Our Objective In Iraq Is Victory&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-48732</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Jun 2006 14:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/#comment-48732</guid>
		<description>I was just extrapolating, my man, what can be extrapolated from Mark&#039;s comment that we should emphasize the positive over the negative all the time, rather than the right over the wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was just extrapolating, my man, what can be extrapolated from Mark&#8217;s comment that we should emphasize the positive over the negative all the time, rather than the right over the wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megapotamus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-47501</link>
		<dc:creator>megapotamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/#comment-47501</guid>
		<description>&quot;Positively wrong&quot; is a mere assertion. We thirst for details, oh how we thirst! This burp from Fargus though, is indicative. &quot;Quagmire!&quot; &quot;Disaster!&quot; &quot;Fraud!&quot; and a dozen other dire and slanderous characterizations abound and always are turned up to 11. But like the House and Senate votes show, force the Dems to actually DO something or even simply SAY something substantive on record and the choirs of crickets drown out any nearby jackhammers. Kerry tried to square the circle of the Democrats rhetoric of high standards on human rights, liberty, decency and expanded democracy with their actual voting record and came acropper. This is one thing I do not blame the Jr Sen for. He assumed an impossible task and is reviled for his failure to upend logic successfully. Sadly for the Reality Based Community there is Reality and then reality. One drives out the other eventually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Positively wrong&#8221; is a mere assertion. We thirst for details, oh how we thirst! This burp from Fargus though, is indicative. &#8220;Quagmire!&#8221; &#8220;Disaster!&#8221; &#8220;Fraud!&#8221; and a dozen other dire and slanderous characterizations abound and always are turned up to 11. But like the House and Senate votes show, force the Dems to actually DO something or even simply SAY something substantive on record and the choirs of crickets drown out any nearby jackhammers. Kerry tried to square the circle of the Democrats rhetoric of high standards on human rights, liberty, decency and expanded democracy with their actual voting record and came acropper. This is one thing I do not blame the Jr Sen for. He assumed an impossible task and is reviled for his failure to upend logic successfully. Sadly for the Reality Based Community there is Reality and then reality. One drives out the other eventually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; House Votes To Support Troops</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-47489</link>
		<dc:creator>Blue Crab Boulevard &#187; Blog Archive &#187; House Votes To Support Troops</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 20:03:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/#comment-47489</guid>
		<description>[...] UPDATE: Others: A Blog For All, Decision &#039;08, Riehl World View and Sister Toldjah [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] UPDATE: Others: A Blog For All, Decision &#39;08, Riehl World View and Sister Toldjah [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-47465</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 19:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/#comment-47465</guid>
		<description>We shall see...despite all the bad polling numbers, I don&#039;t think the Americans are ready to write this war off, when it appears that the tide is turning in our favor...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We shall see&#8230;despite all the bad polling numbers, I don&#8217;t think the Americans are ready to write this war off, when it appears that the tide is turning in our favor&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/comment-page-1/#comment-47448</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 18:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/06/16/our-objective-in-iraq-is-victory/#comment-47448</guid>
		<description>Positively wrong over negatively right, eh?  Sounds like a winning strategy to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Positively wrong over negatively right, eh?  Sounds like a winning strategy to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

