<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: For This We Need An Ombudsman?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/comment-page-1/#comment-59851</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Jul 2006 15:50:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/#comment-59851</guid>
		<description>Talking about the SWIFT program, this was printed in the New York Post today:

&quot;...Times executive editor Bill Keller acknowledged on CBS that &quot;there didn&#039;t seem to be any obvious illegality&quot; about the program. 

&quot;I don&#039;t think the threshold test is whether they&#039;ve done something that&#039;s blatantly illegal or outrageous. I think you probably would like to know what they&#039;re doing that&#039;s successful as well,&quot; Keller told &quot;Face the Nation.&quot; &quot;

So if it&#039;s Legal, Successful and Secret it makes the front page of the NYT. 

And how exactly is this different from being an intelligence agency for Al-Qaeda?

http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/mccain_is_latest_to_rip_times_nationalnews_deborah_orin__washington_bureau_chief.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about the SWIFT program, this was printed in the New York Post today:</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;Times executive editor Bill Keller acknowledged on CBS that &#8220;there didn&#8217;t seem to be any obvious illegality&#8221; about the program. </p>
<p>&#8220;I don&#8217;t think the threshold test is whether they&#8217;ve done something that&#8217;s blatantly illegal or outrageous. I think you probably would like to know what they&#8217;re doing that&#8217;s successful as well,&#8221; Keller told &#8220;Face the Nation.&#8221; &#8221;</p>
<p>So if it&#8217;s Legal, Successful and Secret it makes the front page of the NYT. </p>
<p>And how exactly is this different from being an intelligence agency for Al-Qaeda?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/mccain_is_latest_to_rip_times_nationalnews_deborah_orin__washington_bureau_chief.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/mccain_is_latest_to_rip_times_nationalnews_deborah_orin__washington_bureau_chief.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/comment-page-1/#comment-59593</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 21:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/#comment-59593</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not the number of people who know a secret that&#039;s the salient fact, but who knows and who doesn&#039;t know. After all, there were tens of thousand of people who knew of the Manhattan project or the Ultra secret in World War II, but thankfully none of them were Germans. And if Swift representative had to be stationed alongside any government intelligent agent isn&#039;t that more proof that the program wasn&#039;t being abused?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not the number of people who know a secret that&#8217;s the salient fact, but who knows and who doesn&#8217;t know. After all, there were tens of thousand of people who knew of the Manhattan project or the Ultra secret in World War II, but thankfully none of them were Germans. And if Swift representative had to be stationed alongside any government intelligent agent isn&#8217;t that more proof that the program wasn&#8217;t being abused?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Arrogance &#38; Stupidity</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/comment-page-1/#comment-59565</link>
		<dc:creator>Flopping Aces &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The Arrogance &#38; Stupidity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 17:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/#comment-59565</guid>
		<description>[...] Decision &#8216;08 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Decision &#8216;08 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/comment-page-1/#comment-59500</link>
		<dc:creator>dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 15:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/#comment-59500</guid>
		<description>I have a feeling that Orkent would&#039;ve handled the story a bit differently, since he was not the type to indulge in sacred cows over at the NYT. Perhaps that&#039;s one of the reasons why he&#039;s no longer there, and that&#039;s to the great loss to the NYT and their readership.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a feeling that Orkent would&#8217;ve handled the story a bit differently, since he was not the type to indulge in sacred cows over at the NYT. Perhaps that&#8217;s one of the reasons why he&#8217;s no longer there, and that&#8217;s to the great loss to the NYT and their readership.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: enrevanche</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/comment-page-1/#comment-59483</link>
		<dc:creator>enrevanche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 14:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/07/02/for-this-we-need-an-ombudsman/#comment-59483</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;RINO Sightings, long July 4 Weekend Edition&lt;/strong&gt;

First, a hearty &quot;welcome back to the Intarwebs&quot; to Rusty Shackleford of The Jawa Report, who had a recent spot of trouble with a distributed denial of service attack.

After nearly two weeks of fighting a cyberterrorist attack launched by Turkish ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>RINO Sightings, long July 4 Weekend Edition</strong></p>
<p>First, a hearty &#8220;welcome back to the Intarwebs&#8221; to Rusty Shackleford of The Jawa Report, who had a recent spot of trouble with a distributed denial of service attack.</p>
<p>After nearly two weeks of fighting a cyberterrorist attack launched by Turkish &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

