(In all honesty, maybe 2% of the country have actually followed the case, but polls are polls)

“given that the person who leaked Valerie Plame’s name to the press has been shown to be richard Armitage, do you still believe that Rove is guilty of the same offense?”

I know, a leading question, but then this story has been propelled by leading statements and innuendos from liberal writers.

I note more specific ‘false representations’ by Fitz in his court filings to the USSC and US Court of Appeals. In those filings he defines his investigation as looking into who leaked Val’s details to Novak in possible retaliation. But at that time he knew the answers! What he was doing was going on a fishing expedition when he tried to coerce Miller and Cooper to testify – it had nothing to do with what HE defined as his investigation. He misled the courts. No small matter.

Cheers,

AJStrata

Squeeze some more more political juice out of a corpse…

The oblermann monologue from last night said it all, confusion and hurt abound.

The plame conspiracy can linger as long as they want, but the corpse is starting to stink and sooner or later they’ll have to bury it. or keep genuflecting by it.