<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lieberman Has Wide Lead Over Lamont&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: megapotamus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-101170</link>
		<dc:creator>megapotamus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Sep 2006 22:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/#comment-101170</guid>
		<description>They said this race was Lamont&#039;s to lose and he is WAY ahead there. This guy actually makes Edwards look 3-D by comparison. Hold on, Joe. Ned is scrabbling like a drowning rat already. Could this flameout finally impinge a taste of scorched reality onto the Reality Based Community?
Eh, I think not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They said this race was Lamont&#8217;s to lose and he is WAY ahead there. This guy actually makes Edwards look 3-D by comparison. Hold on, Joe. Ned is scrabbling like a drowning rat already. Could this flameout finally impinge a taste of scorched reality onto the Reality Based Community?<br />
Eh, I think not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-100874</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 22:37:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/#comment-100874</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s an interesting question, would an independant Joe Lieberman endorse the Democratic nominee for President? Even more interesting, would Lieberman endorse the Democratic nominee if said nominee is Al Gore? My guess is if Gore is the nominee, Lieberman will, at a minimum, publicly withhold his endorsement in 2008 (ie: payback for Gore&#039;s witholding HIS endorsement in the CT Senate Primary).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s an interesting question, would an independant Joe Lieberman endorse the Democratic nominee for President? Even more interesting, would Lieberman endorse the Democratic nominee if said nominee is Al Gore? My guess is if Gore is the nominee, Lieberman will, at a minimum, publicly withhold his endorsement in 2008 (ie: payback for Gore&#8217;s witholding HIS endorsement in the CT Senate Primary).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mtl</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-100762</link>
		<dc:creator>mtl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 15:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/#comment-100762</guid>
		<description>Do you think that the fluctuation in the CT polls reflects a larger, national sentiment about Iraq?  It seems to be the only issue that the election is based on. 

Ned is simply stuck at 41%.  Even Bush has better approval ratings.  The only number that tends to fluctuate is Joe&#039;s.  I think what is happening, once again,is that the public is unhappy with Iraq and its perceived architects, but is getting closer to having to decide who is capable of handling it.  Not a boost for the gop, but more for Joe as an honest democrat.  If Lieberman were to declare Iraq a failure, it has bipartisan authority and impact.

A lieberman loss would do massive damage to the credbility of the dems on foreign policy.  I think that is what the moderate left is realizing in ct.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think that the fluctuation in the CT polls reflects a larger, national sentiment about Iraq?  It seems to be the only issue that the election is based on. </p>
<p>Ned is simply stuck at 41%.  Even Bush has better approval ratings.  The only number that tends to fluctuate is Joe&#8217;s.  I think what is happening, once again,is that the public is unhappy with Iraq and its perceived architects, but is getting closer to having to decide who is capable of handling it.  Not a boost for the gop, but more for Joe as an honest democrat.  If Lieberman were to declare Iraq a failure, it has bipartisan authority and impact.</p>
<p>A lieberman loss would do massive damage to the credbility of the dems on foreign policy.  I think that is what the moderate left is realizing in ct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/comment-page-1/#comment-100745</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 14:38:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/09/28/lieberman-has-wide-lead-over-lamont/#comment-100745</guid>
		<description>If Joe wins, it will be quite interesting to see how he conducts his operations regarding the GOP vs. the Dems. Will he be a pragmatist, or will vengeance rule the day? I, for one, would love to find out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Joe wins, it will be quite interesting to see how he conducts his operations regarding the GOP vs. the Dems. Will he be a pragmatist, or will vengeance rule the day? I, for one, would love to find out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

