Comments on: China Isn’t Serious About The Nuclear Threat http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/ Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: Dmac http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-108006 Dmac Mon, 16 Oct 2006 21:42:37 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/#comment-108006 While I detested most of the man's politics, Jesse Helms was right about one thing - the UN is morally bankrupt and a useless institution, and does not deserve our dues or our hosting duties. They're no better than the League of Nations was in it's time, and they've had many more decades to demonstrate their ineffectiveness. Time to kick them out, closing time is here. While I detested most of the man’s politics, Jesse Helms was right about one thing – the UN is morally bankrupt and a useless institution, and does not deserve our dues or our hosting duties. They’re no better than the League of Nations was in it’s time, and they’ve had many more decades to demonstrate their ineffectiveness. Time to kick them out, closing time is here.

]]> By: Wake up America http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-107976 Wake up America Mon, 16 Oct 2006 20:35:31 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/#comment-107976 <strong> China DOES Inspect NK Cargo Despite Words to the Contrary</strong> Despite reports of China balking at inspecting North Korea's cargo trucks, they seem to be implementing the UN's resolution. ( Resolution 1718 can be found here. ) China DOES Inspect NK Cargo Despite Words to the Contrary

Despite reports of China balking at inspecting North Korea’s cargo trucks, they seem to be implementing the UN’s resolution. ( Resolution 1718 can be found here. )

]]> By: Andy http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-107850 Andy Mon, 16 Oct 2006 16:36:13 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/#comment-107850 As for SoKo, what's that ditty about trying something again & again in hopes of a new outcome? <a href="http://insider.washingtontimes.com/articles/normal.php?StoryID=20061015-122427-4908r" rel="nofollow">Roh may be all about Sunshine, but only 11% support it while over 40% support the main opposition</a>. You could say that Roh is being twilighted by reality. And to think Bush had it bad polling in the 40% As for SoKo, what’s that ditty about trying something again & again in hopes of a new outcome? Roh may be all about Sunshine, but only 11% support it while over 40% support the main opposition. You could say that Roh is being twilighted by reality. And to think Bush had it bad polling in the 40%

]]> By: too many steves http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-107797 too many steves Mon, 16 Oct 2006 13:57:53 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/10/16/china-isnt-serious-about-the-nuclear-threat/#comment-107797 And bankrupt it shall remain until someone (read: the United States) takes the important and serious step of announcing our withdrawl from the no longer (ever?) august body. And bankrupt it shall remain until someone (read: the United States) takes the important and serious step of announcing our withdrawl from the no longer (ever?) august body.

]]>