Comments on: Matt Stoller Still Can’t Catch A Clue http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/30/matt-stoller-still-cant-catch-a-clue/ Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:29:20 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Mark http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/30/matt-stoller-still-cant-catch-a-clue/comment-page-1/#comment-124351 Mark Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:42:09 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/10/30/matt-stoller-still-cant-catch-a-clue/#comment-124351 I mean low turnout compared to the general election...you are correct that for a primary, the turnout was high. I'll plead guilty to poor wording... I mean low turnout compared to the general election…you are correct that for a primary, the turnout was high. I’ll plead guilty to poor wording…

]]> By: Gabe http://informedspeculation.com/2006/10/30/matt-stoller-still-cant-catch-a-clue/comment-page-1/#comment-124350 Gabe Wed, 01 Nov 2006 21:39:48 +0000 http://decision08.net/2006/10/30/matt-stoller-still-cant-catch-a-clue/#comment-124350 <i>Ned Lamont won the Democratic primary because the activist wing was motivated to vote in a very low turnout affair.</i> Even though this was a rare August primary, which should have depressed turnout, this was the highest turnout primary in state history. What exactly did you mean by "a low turnout affair"? Ned Lamont won the Democratic primary because the activist wing was motivated to vote in a very low turnout affair.

Even though this was a rare August primary, which should have depressed turnout, this was the highest turnout primary in state history. What exactly did you mean by “a low turnout affair”?

]]>