<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Say Hello To Speaker Pelosi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe Weaver</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-133613</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe Weaver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 04:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-133613</guid>
		<description>The Democrats will attempt to raise taxes of the rich. Massive increases. It&#039;s so sad, too bad, but that&#039;s the only way to close the gap, bring down the deficit and to bring some fiscal sanity back. You can&#039;t spend more than you make for a prolonged a period as we&#039;ve seen. Bush has racked up nearly 6 years of deficit spending. Massive tax breaks for the wealthy while the country is at war. The national debt stands at well over 8 trillion. But no other president before him, Dem or Republican has ever followed such a reckless prescription. It was time for a change, take the toy away from the Boy President, ground him for a while and to restore some order to Congress and the financial purse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Democrats will attempt to raise taxes of the rich. Massive increases. It&#8217;s so sad, too bad, but that&#8217;s the only way to close the gap, bring down the deficit and to bring some fiscal sanity back. You can&#8217;t spend more than you make for a prolonged a period as we&#8217;ve seen. Bush has racked up nearly 6 years of deficit spending. Massive tax breaks for the wealthy while the country is at war. The national debt stands at well over 8 trillion. But no other president before him, Dem or Republican has ever followed such a reckless prescription. It was time for a change, take the toy away from the Boy President, ground him for a while and to restore some order to Congress and the financial purse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knemon</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-133531</link>
		<dc:creator>Knemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-133531</guid>
		<description>&quot;then W will be able to appoint another conservative justice.&quot;

Not with a Democratic Senate he won&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;then W will be able to appoint another conservative justice.&#8221;</p>
<p>Not with a Democratic Senate he won&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knemon</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-133530</link>
		<dc:creator>Knemon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 02:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-133530</guid>
		<description>&quot;a Libertarian in Republican clothing.&quot;

Here come the purge! Growth through shrinkage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;a Libertarian in Republican clothing.&#8221;</p>
<p>Here come the purge! Growth through shrinkage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-133102</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-133102</guid>
		<description>The only problem that conservatives should have with Rudy is his stance on abortion, but John Paul Stevens leaves the SCOTUS before 2008, then W will be able to appoint another conservative justice. Earlier I worried that if we lost the Senate, Bush would have to appoint another Kennedy (Anthony, not Ted), but I don&#039;t think that Jim Webb, John Tester, and Bob Casey would have voted any differently than their predecessors on Alito, much less Roberts.

And if another conservative joins Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts, then it wouldn&#039;t matter what the president&#039;s views on abortion are, as the justices most likely to step down sooner are the more liberal ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only problem that conservatives should have with Rudy is his stance on abortion, but John Paul Stevens leaves the SCOTUS before 2008, then W will be able to appoint another conservative justice. Earlier I worried that if we lost the Senate, Bush would have to appoint another Kennedy (Anthony, not Ted), but I don&#8217;t think that Jim Webb, John Tester, and Bob Casey would have voted any differently than their predecessors on Alito, much less Roberts.</p>
<p>And if another conservative joins Scalia, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts, then it wouldn&#8217;t matter what the president&#8217;s views on abortion are, as the justices most likely to step down sooner are the more liberal ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-133090</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-133090</guid>
		<description>&quot;Rudy is socially liberal, but is also a fiscal and foreign policy conservative.&quot;  Which makes him mostly, depending on how he feels about &quot;international adventures&quot;, a Libertarian in Republican clothing.  Kinda like former governor of MA, William Weld.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Rudy is socially liberal, but is also a fiscal and foreign policy conservative.&#8221;  Which makes him mostly, depending on how he feels about &#8220;international adventures&#8221;, a Libertarian in Republican clothing.  Kinda like former governor of MA, William Weld.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dmac</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-132981</link>
		<dc:creator>Dmac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 15:26:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-132981</guid>
		<description>Rudy is socially liberal, but is also a fiscal and foreign policy conservative. That&#039;s why I&#039;ve always liked him, and why I&#039;ll vote for him in &#039;08. For his bona fides on the latter two, may I recount just two efforts that made him my #1 candidate for &#039;08:

- his stewardship of the previously &quot;ungovernable&quot; New York City was textbook - he slashed corporate taxes, got many citizens off the welfare rolls, tangled with the previously - intractable public unions and won concessions from them, and beefed up the Police Department substantially - all of which  allowed NYC to rise from the ashes and assume it&#039;s prominent standing today; 

- he had his security detail throw Yasser Arafat out of the New York Met during a performance, and said that terrorists didn&#039;t deserve to have the same priviledges as US citizens, and the hell with his UN bona fides. 

Sure, that last point is more amusing than substantial, but the guy puts his money where his mouth is, every time. He was exactly the same way during his tenure as the AG, when he went up against the mob in order to close down their racketeering efforts on the docks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rudy is socially liberal, but is also a fiscal and foreign policy conservative. That&#8217;s why I&#8217;ve always liked him, and why I&#8217;ll vote for him in &#8217;08. For his bona fides on the latter two, may I recount just two efforts that made him my #1 candidate for &#8217;08:</p>
<p>- his stewardship of the previously &#8220;ungovernable&#8221; New York City was textbook &#8211; he slashed corporate taxes, got many citizens off the welfare rolls, tangled with the previously &#8211; intractable public unions and won concessions from them, and beefed up the Police Department substantially &#8211; all of which  allowed NYC to rise from the ashes and assume it&#8217;s prominent standing today; </p>
<p>- he had his security detail throw Yasser Arafat out of the New York Met during a performance, and said that terrorists didn&#8217;t deserve to have the same priviledges as US citizens, and the hell with his UN bona fides. </p>
<p>Sure, that last point is more amusing than substantial, but the guy puts his money where his mouth is, every time. He was exactly the same way during his tenure as the AG, when he went up against the mob in order to close down their racketeering efforts on the docks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-132932</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:42:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-132932</guid>
		<description>Not to mention calling Giuliani a &quot;liberal&quot; makes as much sense as the bitter Lamont supporters calling Lieberman a right-winger. Giuliani&#039;s &quot;liberalness&quot; comes down to pretty much two things: 1) abortion, where&#039;s admittedly to the left of the party, and; 2) gay marriage, where he holds the exact same position as President Bush - he favors civil unions, not marriage. I happen to think the latter is a silly semantic point, but then again, I&#039;m of a libertarian bent and favor gay marriage myself.

The country is nowhere near any kind of consensus about banning abortion, so I don&#039;t think it makes much difference who the president is; it obviously hasn&#039;t so far. And gay marriage as a practical matter is something over which the president has pretty much no say anyway. But the president does make a real impact on things like taxes and defense, and Giuliani&#039;s right on the money for me in those areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention calling Giuliani a &#8220;liberal&#8221; makes as much sense as the bitter Lamont supporters calling Lieberman a right-winger. Giuliani&#8217;s &#8220;liberalness&#8221; comes down to pretty much two things: 1) abortion, where&#8217;s admittedly to the left of the party, and; 2) gay marriage, where he holds the exact same position as President Bush &#8211; he favors civil unions, not marriage. I happen to think the latter is a silly semantic point, but then again, I&#8217;m of a libertarian bent and favor gay marriage myself.</p>
<p>The country is nowhere near any kind of consensus about banning abortion, so I don&#8217;t think it makes much difference who the president is; it obviously hasn&#8217;t so far. And gay marriage as a practical matter is something over which the president has pretty much no say anyway. But the president does make a real impact on things like taxes and defense, and Giuliani&#8217;s right on the money for me in those areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-132931</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:36:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-132931</guid>
		<description>Anybody seen jwest and his &quot;cold, hard numbers&quot; around?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anybody seen jwest and his &#8220;cold, hard numbers&#8221; around?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-132925</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-132925</guid>
		<description>JB, he&#039;s looking good because we&#039;re going to need a winner in 2008, one who can appeal to the Independents who have so decisively let us know of their discontent yesterday...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JB, he&#8217;s looking good because we&#8217;re going to need a winner in 2008, one who can appeal to the Independents who have so decisively let us know of their discontent yesterday&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pigilito</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/comment-page-1/#comment-132919</link>
		<dc:creator>pigilito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/07/say-hello-to-speaker-pelosi/#comment-132919</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t see Dem control of Congress as necessarily a bad thing.  Bush will veto what he doesn&#039;t like, and the Dems will be on their guard not to appear too weak on terror, etc.

If it holds down government spending for the next two years (hard to imagine the next Congress spending more than what the Repubs have over the past few years) while not compromising national security, I&#039;ll be reasonably happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see Dem control of Congress as necessarily a bad thing.  Bush will veto what he doesn&#8217;t like, and the Dems will be on their guard not to appear too weak on terror, etc.</p>
<p>If it holds down government spending for the next two years (hard to imagine the next Congress spending more than what the Repubs have over the past few years) while not compromising national security, I&#8217;ll be reasonably happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

