<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: You&#8217;re Speaking My Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/comment-page-1/#comment-143337</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:59:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/#comment-143337</guid>
		<description>jpe, I don&#039;t think the peace part is wrong...it&#039;s a fact that countries with close economic ties are far less likely to go to war...just look at North Korea and China!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>jpe, I don&#8217;t think the peace part is wrong&#8230;it&#8217;s a fact that countries with close economic ties are far less likely to go to war&#8230;just look at North Korea and China!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andy</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/comment-page-1/#comment-143329</link>
		<dc:creator>Andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/#comment-143329</guid>
		<description>And watch for the corresponding rise in inflation &amp; cost of living.  What knuckleheads -- &quot;we demand worker&#039;s rights or it&#039;s nada&quot; is not a zero-sum game.  he only way to improve those &#039;poor&#039; workers is to give them trade so that their standard of living will rise and in turn increase their clout to eventually enjoy the same rights that these knuckleheads take for granted.  It won&#039;t happen overnight simply by wishing it so and certainly won&#039;t happen if they just up and take their marbles home.  

Fair Trade?  Yeah, right.  Earth to Socialist Donks &amp; Rockefella Repubs, Grow up and get a clue!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And watch for the corresponding rise in inflation &amp; cost of living.  What knuckleheads &#8212; &#8220;we demand worker&#8217;s rights or it&#8217;s nada&#8221; is not a zero-sum game.  he only way to improve those &#8216;poor&#8217; workers is to give them trade so that their standard of living will rise and in turn increase their clout to eventually enjoy the same rights that these knuckleheads take for granted.  It won&#8217;t happen overnight simply by wishing it so and certainly won&#8217;t happen if they just up and take their marbles home.  </p>
<p>Fair Trade?  Yeah, right.  Earth to Socialist Donks &amp; Rockefella Repubs, Grow up and get a clue!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jpe</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/comment-page-1/#comment-143325</link>
		<dc:creator>jpe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2006 22:38:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2006/11/20/youre-speaking-my-language/#comment-143325</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m a free trade firebrand, but the editorial slips on the same &quot;aggregate fallacy&quot; (to coin a phrase) that plagued discussions of the domestic economy.  Just because the economy as a whole is doing better doesn&#039;t mean that everyone, or even most people, are doing better.  Same applies to the gains from free trade: the gains are broadly distributed, while the losses are heavily concentrated (not coincidentally in rust belt states where protectionist Dems did quite well).

And the whole bit about peace is really too silly to even go in to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m a free trade firebrand, but the editorial slips on the same &#8220;aggregate fallacy&#8221; (to coin a phrase) that plagued discussions of the domestic economy.  Just because the economy as a whole is doing better doesn&#8217;t mean that everyone, or even most people, are doing better.  Same applies to the gains from free trade: the gains are broadly distributed, while the losses are heavily concentrated (not coincidentally in rust belt states where protectionist Dems did quite well).</p>
<p>And the whole bit about peace is really too silly to even go in to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

