More Good News From Iraq: Sistani Throws His Lot In With The Moderates
Or so it appears:
In the three and a half years since the fall of Saddam Hussein, Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani has been the spiritual custodian of Shiite political dominance here, corralling Iraq’s fractious Shiite political parties into a single alliance to rule the country after centuries of oppression.
But the ayatollah has grown increasingly distressed as the Shiite-led government has proven incapable of taming the violence and improving public services, and he now appears to be backing away from his insistence that the Shiite bloc be the dominant political player here and hold together at all costs, Iraqi and Western officials say.
In recent days, he has given his tentative approval to a proposed American- backed coalition of powerful Shiite, Sunni Arab and Kurdish political parties, the officials say. If it succeeds in becoming the main political force in government, the coalition could dilute Shiite power and ultimately lead to the rupture of the ruling Shiite bloc.
The leaders of the multisectarian coalition say they are seeking to chart a moderate political course by isolating extremist parties and politicians, particularly the powerful Shiite cleric Moktada al-Sadr, whose loyalists comprise a major part of the Shiite bloc.
The aging and reclusive Sistani is considered the final arbiter of Shiite participation in the new coalition, and his willingness to approve it adds greater momentum to the Iraqi and U.S. efforts. So much so that leaders of the Iraqi parties trying to form the new coalition felt confident enough to announce their intentions at a televised news conference last weekend.
Read the whole article; besides being interesting, there is much to be hopeful about. The idea of a new coalition has momentum behind it, and it’s a good one, perhaps even the breakthrough we’ve all been waiting for…

Just so I don’t seem too pollyannaish about this whole plan, here’s Reuel Marc Gerect’s take on the “new coalition” idea we’ve been talking about:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/12/21/opinion/21gerecht.html?_r=1&oref=slogin&pagewanted=print
So when does al-Sadr take a shot at Sistani? Can he?
Thanks, Colin – and forgive me, I meant to give you a shout-out for bringing the article to my attention…and too many steves, I don’t think he can, directly, at least…Sistani has too much prestige…but I’d sure be watching my back, wouldn’t you?…
Absolutely I would. Might explain Sistani’s “reclusive”-ness. al-Sadr is no dope nor neophyte, he would certainly wait until he believed doing so would be productive; or when he felt he had no choice.
The only man the Shiites revere more than Al-Sadr is Al-Sistani, any attempt on Sistani’s life, taken out by Al-Sadr or any other party for that matter and they wouyld be signing their own death warrant.
That is good to know. I am ignorant of the ayatollah hierarchy. If you are correct then this recent development with Sistani is much more positive than I thought.