<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Good Opening Day For The Libby Defense</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-235036</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 15:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-235036</guid>
		<description>Maybe many witnesses have condradicted Libby.  But they are also contradicting themselves.  I think this story was concocted by the media and it has back fired.  Russert, Andrea Mitchell, Judy Miller, David Gregg....all of them.  Mealy mouthed and slimy merchants of trash.  Their overzealous pursuit of the extremely flawed Bush administration got them caught up in a mess the particpiated in a helped create.

This is a classic case of people getting caught talking behid someone&#039;s back and out of school.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe many witnesses have condradicted Libby.  But they are also contradicting themselves.  I think this story was concocted by the media and it has back fired.  Russert, Andrea Mitchell, Judy Miller, David Gregg&#8230;.all of them.  Mealy mouthed and slimy merchants of trash.  Their overzealous pursuit of the extremely flawed Bush administration got them caught up in a mess the particpiated in a helped create.</p>
<p>This is a classic case of people getting caught talking behid someone&#8217;s back and out of school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gunga</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-235012</link>
		<dc:creator>Gunga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-235012</guid>
		<description>If you ignore the facts of the case, you can draw any conclusion from it that you&#039;d like.  The moon was blue last night, therefore Dick Cheney is Satan...  ...and Cheney didn&#039;t say that the OVP was a fourth branch of government.  What he actually said was that liberals were so stupid that a fourth of them couldn&#039;t name one branch of the government if they had a copy of the constitution in their left hand and David Souter&#039;s crotch in their right.  Man, that Cheney is brutal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you ignore the facts of the case, you can draw any conclusion from it that you&#8217;d like.  The moon was blue last night, therefore Dick Cheney is Satan&#8230;  &#8230;and Cheney didn&#8217;t say that the OVP was a fourth branch of government.  What he actually said was that liberals were so stupid that a fourth of them couldn&#8217;t name one branch of the government if they had a copy of the constitution in their left hand and David Souter&#8217;s crotch in their right.  Man, that Cheney is brutal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-235003</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 14:16:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-235003</guid>
		<description>None, aside from Cheney himself.  I just didn&#039;t see a better place to ask it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>None, aside from Cheney himself.  I just didn&#8217;t see a better place to ask it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-234840</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 06:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-234840</guid>
		<description>And the connection to the Libby Trial is...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the connection to the Libby Trial is&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-234833</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 05:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-234833</guid>
		<description>Anything to say, Mark, about Cheney&#039;s assertion that the OVP is a fourth branch of government heretofore unknown?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anything to say, Mark, about Cheney&#8217;s assertion that the OVP is a fourth branch of government heretofore unknown?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-234810</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:38:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-234810</guid>
		<description>They are assertions of the prosecutor which are backed by evidence and testimony (including Libby&#039;s).  

Are they proven?  No:  the verdict is not in.  That&#039;s why this is all hypothetical.  My point is only that if there is a conviction, it points strongly to subornation of perjury by the Vice President.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are assertions of the prosecutor which are backed by evidence and testimony (including Libby&#8217;s).  </p>
<p>Are they proven?  No:  the verdict is not in.  That&#8217;s why this is all hypothetical.  My point is only that if there is a conviction, it points strongly to subornation of perjury by the Vice President.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-234809</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-234809</guid>
		<description>I thought that&#039;s what this trial was all about!...no, look, here&#039;s what I&#039;m objecting to - you&#039;re putting assertions by the prosecutor forward as if they were proven facts, are you not?...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought that&#8217;s what this trial was all about!&#8230;no, look, here&#8217;s what I&#8217;m objecting to &#8211; you&#8217;re putting assertions by the prosecutor forward as if they were proven facts, are you not?&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-234808</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-234808</guid>
		<description>We know that Libby and Cheney discussed Valerie Plame&#039;s identity before it was leaked.  We know that Cheney instructed Libby to leak parts of the NIE to Judith Wilson in an effort to discredit Wilson.  Is it your contention that Cheney did not know that Libby would reveal Valerie Plame&#039;s identity to the press?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We know that Libby and Cheney discussed Valerie Plame&#8217;s identity before it was leaked.  We know that Cheney instructed Libby to leak parts of the NIE to Judith Wilson in an effort to discredit Wilson.  Is it your contention that Cheney did not know that Libby would reveal Valerie Plame&#8217;s identity to the press?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-234789</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-234789</guid>
		<description>And I love the way you say Cheney instructed Libby to disclose Plame&#039;s identity, as if that were just a given...and then turn around and say Libby is entitled to the presumption of innonence...been reading the Times again, I see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I love the way you say Cheney instructed Libby to disclose Plame&#8217;s identity, as if that were just a given&#8230;and then turn around and say Libby is entitled to the presumption of innonence&#8230;been reading the Times again, I see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/comment-page-1/#comment-234788</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 04:15:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/02/12/a-good-opening-day-for-the-libby-defense/#comment-234788</guid>
		<description>Um, Peter, I&#039;m sorry, but you&#039;re missing the GIANT ELEPHANT (literally) in the room.  Dick Cheney has not been charged with anything (nor will he be - that boat has long since sailed)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, Peter, I&#8217;m sorry, but you&#8217;re missing the GIANT ELEPHANT (literally) in the room.  Dick Cheney has not been charged with anything (nor will he be &#8211; that boat has long since sailed)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

