<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: TIME Poll: Rudy By 14</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-253460</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Mar 2007 05:48:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-253460</guid>
		<description>BARACK OBAMA FOR 2008! I like his views</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BARACK OBAMA FOR 2008! I like his views</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-249192</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 12:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-249192</guid>
		<description>Interesting to track and watch, but it is SOOOOO early!  We are about a year away from the first primary.  Recall how strong Bush senior was against the field at this time in 1992, which was the actual election year.

We have a LOOOOOOOONG way to go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting to track and watch, but it is SOOOOO early!  We are about a year away from the first primary.  Recall how strong Bush senior was against the field at this time in 1992, which was the actual election year.</p>
<p>We have a LOOOOOOOONG way to go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248849</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:53:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248849</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going with Rudy (I usually lean towards the democrats).  This guy kicks some Hillary butt.  What a waste for the democrats.  LOL..  Thank the lord I never bet on a democrat winning the next election.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going with Rudy (I usually lean towards the democrats).  This guy kicks some Hillary butt.  What a waste for the democrats.  LOL..  Thank the lord I never bet on a democrat winning the next election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248824</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 02:30:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248824</guid>
		<description>I liked James Taranto&#039;s take on that clip: Can you imagine any other candidate (except Hillary for obvious reasons) who is secure enough in his masculinity to do something like this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked James Taranto&#8217;s take on that clip: Can you imagine any other candidate (except Hillary for obvious reasons) who is secure enough in his masculinity to do something like this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248803</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 01:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248803</guid>
		<description>Scandelous.  Heaven forbid someone have some fun.  If you want to believe this will bring down Rudy I saw bring it on.  Hahahahahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scandelous.  Heaven forbid someone have some fun.  If you want to believe this will bring down Rudy I saw bring it on.  Hahahahahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248697</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 23:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248697</guid>
		<description>Oh, please...yes, he&#039;s really scared of this coming out, that&#039;s why he made it for a national television show.

For cryin&#039; out loud - how do I know Rudy&#039;s about to win? Because people are throwing up any ol&#039; crap already, and hoping it sticks (and guess what? None of it is)...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, please&#8230;yes, he&#8217;s really scared of this coming out, that&#8217;s why he made it for a national television show.</p>
<p>For cryin&#8217; out loud &#8211; how do I know Rudy&#8217;s about to win? Because people are throwing up any ol&#8217; crap already, and hoping it sticks (and guess what? None of it is)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: minorripper</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248693</link>
		<dc:creator>minorripper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 22:57:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248693</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a video I&#039;m pretty sure Rudy wish he hadn&#039;t made....Presidential?  Judge for yourself--
http://minor-ripper.blogspot.com/2007/02/video-rudy-giuliani-does-not-want-you.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a video I&#8217;m pretty sure Rudy wish he hadn&#8217;t made&#8230;.Presidential?  Judge for yourself&#8211;<br />
<a href="http://minor-ripper.blogspot.com/2007/02/video-rudy-giuliani-does-not-want-you.html" rel="nofollow">http://minor-ripper.blogspot.com/2007/02/video-rudy-giuliani-does-not-want-you.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248649</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 21:59:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248649</guid>
		<description>I assume you&#039;re talking about the Democratic race that year, Fargus, so I decided to do some Googling. If your point is that Kerry was not the leader, you&#039;re correct. Here&#039;s what &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1284.xml?ReleaseID=384&amp;What=bush%202004&amp;strArea=6;&amp;strTime=120&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Quinnipiac reported:&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;blockquote&gt;If New York Sen. Hillary Clinton seeks the nomination for President next year, she gets the support of 37 percent of Democrats nationwide, followed by:  
Missouri Congressman Richard Gephardt with 13 percent; 
Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman with 12 percent; 
Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry with 8 percent; 
North Carolina Sen. John Edwards and Florida Sen. Bob Graham with 4 percent each; 
Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun and Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich with 3 percent each; 
Rev. Al Sharpton with 2 percent. 
 &lt;/blockquote&gt; But let&#039;s look at March 1999. According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.usatoday.com/news/poll22.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this poll,&lt;/a&gt; Bush was already the clear leader among Republicans with 52 percent to Elizabeth Dole&#039;s 20 percent. Gore had 58 percent of Democrats, and Bradley had 21 percent.

So what do these results tell about nomination races at this stage of the game? It seems to me that if someone&#039;s got a clear, solid lead, he or she is unlikely to lose, as we saw in the 2000 races. If no one&#039;s got a clear lead, anyone can break out of the pack, as we saw in 2004.

Giuliani&#039;s lead right now is somewhere in between those two models, which is why he can&#039;t be considered inevitable, but neither can he be dismissed as a temporary blip. What has to be unnerving for the McCain campaign is the surging nature of Giuliani&#039;s poll lead of late; it&#039;s not inconceivable that he could develop one of those auras of inevitability if it continues, and then start collecting the money and endorsements that naturally follow.

Now it&#039;s possible Giuliani could be heading toward a Dean-style flameout - just when he starts looking inevitable, voters pull back. But it&#039;s worth recalling that Giuliani&#039;s appeal so far has been personal - he&#039;s the law &#039;n&#039; order guy who stood tall on Sept. 11. Dean&#039;s appeal had little to do with the man - no one knew who he was - so much as full-throated attack on President Bush and the war in Iraq. I suspect the lack of knowledge of who Dean was made it easier for him to be caricaturized and destroyed. I don&#039;t think that will be likely to happen to Giuliani, who has a well-established political persona.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I assume you&#8217;re talking about the Democratic race that year, Fargus, so I decided to do some Googling. If your point is that Kerry was not the leader, you&#8217;re correct. Here&#8217;s what <a href="http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1284.xml?ReleaseID=384&amp;What=bush%202004&amp;strArea=6;&amp;strTime=120" rel="nofollow">Quinnipiac reported:</a><br />
<blockquote>If New York Sen. Hillary Clinton seeks the nomination for President next year, she gets the support of 37 percent of Democrats nationwide, followed by:<br />
Missouri Congressman Richard Gephardt with 13 percent;<br />
Connecticut Sen. Joseph Lieberman with 12 percent;<br />
Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry with 8 percent;<br />
North Carolina Sen. John Edwards and Florida Sen. Bob Graham with 4 percent each;<br />
Former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, Illinois Sen. Carol Moseley-Braun and Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich with 3 percent each;<br />
Rev. Al Sharpton with 2 percent.
 </p></blockquote>
<p> But let&#8217;s look at March 1999. According to <a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/poll22.htm" rel="nofollow">this poll,</a> Bush was already the clear leader among Republicans with 52 percent to Elizabeth Dole&#8217;s 20 percent. Gore had 58 percent of Democrats, and Bradley had 21 percent.</p>
<p>So what do these results tell about nomination races at this stage of the game? It seems to me that if someone&#8217;s got a clear, solid lead, he or she is unlikely to lose, as we saw in the 2000 races. If no one&#8217;s got a clear lead, anyone can break out of the pack, as we saw in 2004.</p>
<p>Giuliani&#8217;s lead right now is somewhere in between those two models, which is why he can&#8217;t be considered inevitable, but neither can he be dismissed as a temporary blip. What has to be unnerving for the McCain campaign is the surging nature of Giuliani&#8217;s poll lead of late; it&#8217;s not inconceivable that he could develop one of those auras of inevitability if it continues, and then start collecting the money and endorsements that naturally follow.</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s possible Giuliani could be heading toward a Dean-style flameout &#8211; just when he starts looking inevitable, voters pull back. But it&#8217;s worth recalling that Giuliani&#8217;s appeal so far has been personal &#8211; he&#8217;s the law &#8216;n&#8217; order guy who stood tall on Sept. 11. Dean&#8217;s appeal had little to do with the man &#8211; no one knew who he was &#8211; so much as full-throated attack on President Bush and the war in Iraq. I suspect the lack of knowledge of who Dean was made it easier for him to be caricaturized and destroyed. I don&#8217;t think that will be likely to happen to Giuliani, who has a well-established political persona.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248584</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:43:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248584</guid>
		<description>Sorry, 2003.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, 2003.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/comment-page-1/#comment-248579</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/03/01/time-poll-rudy-by-14/#comment-248579</guid>
		<description>Who was running best in early March 2002?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Who was running best in early March 2002?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
