Comments on: Three GOP Frontrunners All Denounce Coulter’s Slur Of John Edwards

By: peter

peter — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 23:13:17 +0000

Well said.

Activists may be overzealous but, to quote one of them, extremism in pursuit of liberty is no vice and moderation in pursuit of justice is no virtue.

By: Mark

Mark — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 17:30:18 +0000

Now hold on, Scott – first of all, don’t presume to know my ‘ideology’. Second, you can oppose civil unions or gay marriage without being a bigot who calls gay people ‘faggots’ (my own preference: let the voters decide, and not the courts). Third, I’m not a big fan of CPAC – it’s full of people who are the ideological mirrors of the kind of people who would attend “Yearly Kos” – I’m suspicious of activists, on either side, as they tend to be overzealous, often in pursuit of the wrong causes, and in general, tend to harm their respective parties more than they help them, in my view…I guarantee you, had I been invited (and I wasn’t – I’m too small a fish, I guess), Ann Coulter would have been on my ‘must-skip’ list. It would be a nice gesture if CPAC refused to invite her back next year, but time will tell…

By: Scott

Scott — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:56:06 +0000

And why do you suppose that CPAC invited her?? She continues to one of the chosen faces of your ideology. You can’t have it both ways my friend. I can’t recall Mark, did you support the part of the 2004 Republican platform that explictly stated the party was against civil unions? Props to you if spoke aganst it, but you would have been in the minority. Why give gays the right to make medical decisions or visit their loved ones in the hospital, after all, they’re only “faggots.” Nice ideology:(

It is nice however, that Rudy G’s values moving into the lead of the new Conservative ideology among the public. George Bush has done to the party what no Democrat could have done.

By: Minor Ripper

Minor Ripper — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:45:59 +0000

More proof that Ann really isn’t the sharpest knife in the shed…(see video)
http://minor-ripper.blogspot.com/2006/12/ann-coulter-gets-owned.html

By: mikebdot

mikebdot — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:01:26 +0000

I suppose it goes without saying then that she WON’T be invited to speak again next year? If that’s the case, great, but even so, it’s not as though this is the first controversial thing she has said at the very same conference. That is his point, hyperbole aside. Not sure how it makes him 100% incorrect.

By: The Heretik : An Endorsement

The Heretik : An Endorsement — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 14:34:39 +0000

[...] Does anybody care what Coulter says anymore? One or two people: Hot Air, Outside The Beltway, Argghhh!, TPMCafe blogs, ECHIDNE OF THE SNAKES, Liberty Street, The Reaction, Taylor Marsh, Jon Swift, Decision ‘08, Iowa Voice, Blog P.I., Michael P.F. van der Galiën, Wizbang, PowersPoint, QandO, Daily Kos, skippy the bush kangaroo, Donklephant and CorrenteWire [...]

By: too many steves

too many steves — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 12:45:29 +0000

Mark, you have fallen for a cheap political trick. As others have said, when we peer into the souls of these conservatives we KNOW that they agree with and secretly support Ann Coulter. I mean, Romney sends out a spokesman? What does that tell you? McCain calls the remarks “wildly inappropriate” instead of just plain wrong? And Giuliani, well, he spoke most clearly but, of course, he’s a cross-dresser so he has to prove his non-homosexuality.

Wake up man!

P.S. Like sarcasm, facetiousness is often misunderstood in the internet ether.