And The Winner (So Far)…

…for most hyperventilatingly overreaching reaction to the Libby verdict goes to (drum roll, please!) -

Howard Fineman of Newsweek:

The stunning, vehement verdict in the Scooter Libby trial—that he lied, repeatedly, big time—isn’t really about Scooter Libby at all. It is about how and why we went to war in Iraq, and about how Vice President Dick Cheney got us there.

Fineman is, naturally, wrong on all counts – the verdict was not about those other things, and the jurors told us so.  So did Joseph Wilson himself…and there was nothing stunning about it; most courtroom observers predicted it (hey, when a jury is out ten days, if you don’t get a hung jury, you’re cooked)but don’t clean off the shelf space for your trophy yet, Howard…after all, Frank Rich, MoDo, and Eleanor Clift have yet to weigh in…

5 comments to And The Winner (So Far)…

  • Gwedd

    Comrades,

    Real justice in this case wasn’t served today, nor will it be served tomorrow. Real, palpable, justice will only be served when Joe Wilson is indicted, sent to trial, convicted, and sent to prison for lying under oath to Congress.

    Hopefully, the President will issue Mr. Libby a pardon, although it better accompany a pardon for the two Border Patrol Agents doing time for doing their job.

    Respects,

  • What did Joe Wilson lie under oath to Congress about?

    And since when is justice relative? If a rapist is convicted today, does it mean nothing because a car thief is still walking the streets?

  • Mike

    If anything, all this debacle showed was the truley insipid nature of “leak” politics. We have seen it in all administrations. Libby didn’t leak squat. Or at least he wasn’t convicted of it, nor was he charged. Can anyone really remeber every little detail of every cnversation you have with the people you deal with everyday? Perjury is a cop out charge, especially in this gossip and leak rich environment. Don’t get me wrong, it is a crime, and in most cases it should be punished. But here, I think it was an over reach.

    We had a cop up here in Boston who was charged, tried, and convicted federally of perjury. He had to prove he didn’t see something. It took 10 years and Bob Bennet to get his conviction overturned. He just started back to work as a Patrolman. He lost a lot of years, but justice prevailed. I think it will here to.

    As far as I could tell, they were all lying. Russert, Mitchell, Fleisher, Wilson, Plame, Wilson, Cooper….all of them and more.

  • From Wikipedia article on Joe Wilson:

    The Senate Intelligence Committee Report also finds that Wilson’s description of the information provided to him by the CIA differed from the CIA’s account.

    Wilson claimed that the CIA told him about documents pertaining to an alleged uranium sale to Iraq.
    The CIA reports officer denied giving Wilson any such information and noted there were no such “documents” circulating at the time.

    citation: Many further details of former Ambassador Wilson’s trip to Niger can be found in the body of the U.S. Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Report on the U.S. Intelligence Community’s Prewar Intelligence Assessments on Iraq, which contains a 48-page section dealing with intelligence related to Niger. GPO Access.gov The Senate Intelligence Committee ReportPDF July 7, 2006, updated July 9, 2006, accessed September 18, 2006.

    I don’t know for certain, but I would assume that the “description” mentioned was given in testimony before Congress.

  • Dennis

    I just want to know how a verdict can be “vehement.”

Leave a Reply

 

 

 

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>