<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Code Of Conduct &#8211; Why Bother?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/comment-page-1/#comment-277668</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 15:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/#comment-277668</guid>
		<description>To which I say, &quot;Grow up.&quot;.  I&#039;m all for civility in discourse, but would choose a much different approach: simply ignore those for whom incivility is SOP.  If I were still 12 years old I would say &quot;Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me.&quot; or, even, &quot;I&#039;m rubber and you&#039;re glue, everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you.&quot;.  If I were really inflamed I would include exclamation points.

Then there is the question of who is arbiter of this &quot;Code of Conduct&quot;?  Can we vote on what is and is not allowed?  Will it be a sort of Geneva Conventions for blogospheric warfare?

Nope, count me among those hurling rotten vegetables at this idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To which I say, &#8220;Grow up.&#8221;.  I&#8217;m all for civility in discourse, but would choose a much different approach: simply ignore those for whom incivility is SOP.  If I were still 12 years old I would say &#8220;Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me.&#8221; or, even, &#8220;I&#8217;m rubber and you&#8217;re glue, everything you say bounces off me and sticks to you.&#8221;.  If I were really inflamed I would include exclamation points.</p>
<p>Then there is the question of who is arbiter of this &#8220;Code of Conduct&#8221;?  Can we vote on what is and is not allowed?  Will it be a sort of Geneva Conventions for blogospheric warfare?</p>
<p>Nope, count me among those hurling rotten vegetables at this idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nettie</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/comment-page-1/#comment-277499</link>
		<dc:creator>nettie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Apr 2007 06:04:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/#comment-277499</guid>
		<description>aw, come on. who wants to take all the fun out of it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>aw, come on. who wants to take all the fun out of it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwedd</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/comment-page-1/#comment-277001</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 23:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/#comment-277001</guid>
		<description>Mark,

   Well, I&#039;d support such a device, but only after the MSM adopt a code of fact-checking and honesty in reporting.

    The least they could do is remove the bias log from their own eye before complaining about the mote in the blogger&#039;s.

     Respects,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark,</p>
<p>   Well, I&#8217;d support such a device, but only after the MSM adopt a code of fact-checking and honesty in reporting.</p>
<p>    The least they could do is remove the bias log from their own eye before complaining about the mote in the blogger&#8217;s.</p>
<p>     Respects,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dennis</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/comment-page-1/#comment-276891</link>
		<dc:creator>Dennis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Apr 2007 17:34:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2007/04/12/a-code-of-conduct-why-bother/#comment-276891</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m kind of baffled why this is getting any attention at all. Your first paragraph sums up the problem perfectly. I&#039;m all in favor of more civility on the Web, but really, other than asking people to think twice before they launch their meanest, darkest thoughts into the ether, what else can be done that might be effective without being self-evidently unconstitutional?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m kind of baffled why this is getting any attention at all. Your first paragraph sums up the problem perfectly. I&#8217;m all in favor of more civility on the Web, but really, other than asking people to think twice before they launch their meanest, darkest thoughts into the ether, what else can be done that might be effective without being self-evidently unconstitutional?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

