<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: And Then Came New Hampshire</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com -</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-437144</link>
		<dc:creator>Connecting News, Commentaries and Blogs at NineReports.com -</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 04:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-437144</guid>
		<description>[...] is a loony ...  cause i can - Last Updated -  Friday January 25&#160;    Request a Trackback     And Then Came New Hampshire  Those looking to read the tea leaves for Tuesday&#8217;s New Hampshire vote are asking if the Iowa [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] is a loony &#8230;  cause i can &#8211; Last Updated &#8211;  Friday January 25&nbsp;    Request a Trackback     And Then Came New Hampshire  Those looking to read the tea leaves for Tuesday&#8217;s New Hampshire vote are asking if the Iowa [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-423446</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jan 2008 00:48:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-423446</guid>
		<description>Clint:

Maybe, but just for s&amp;g here&#039;s a link from someone else who recently made this speculation:

http://www.eyeon08.com/2008/01/11/fred-for-real-or-a-stalking-horse/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint:</p>
<p>Maybe, but just for s&amp;g here&#8217;s a link from someone else who recently made this speculation:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.eyeon08.com/2008/01/11/fred-for-real-or-a-stalking-horse/" rel="nofollow">http://www.eyeon08.com/2008/01/11/fred-for-real-or-a-stalking-horse/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CinemActivist</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-420547</link>
		<dc:creator>CinemActivist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jan 2008 23:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-420547</guid>
		<description>What you think of Giuliani deciding not to attend Iowa and NH? I find it a bit pompous. You should check out this DVD “Giuliani Time”. It’ll tell you a lot about what Giuliani really is like.

You can get it here: http://www.cinemalibrestore.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What you think of Giuliani deciding not to attend Iowa and NH? I find it a bit pompous. You should check out this DVD “Giuliani Time”. It’ll tell you a lot about what Giuliani really is like.</p>
<p>You can get it here: <a href="http://www.cinemalibrestore.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.cinemalibrestore.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-419144</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 05:54:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-419144</guid>
		<description>I came across an interesting article from the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/tim_hames/article3142140.ece&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Time of London&lt;/a&gt; a few hours ago. This main point that I took from it focuses on the 38% likelihood that a GOP candidate will be in the White House in 2009.

The columnist, Tim Hames, suggests that because the 38% is an average of all GOP candidates against all Dems, the prospect of a GOP president rises when the nominee is more moderate (such as McCain or Giuliani) and declines for the more conservative candidates (Huckabee and Romney), and that Thompson has exactly a 38% chance (if he gets the nomination).

I&#039;m hoping that the calculation actually includes Ron Paul with his zero percent chance of winning a general election, but since he also has a zero percent chance of getting the GOP nod, his prospects against Hillary probably aren&#039;t included.

Anyway, while I am a Giuliani supporter, I think that McCain is, at worst, only slightly less electable (due more to his age than any policy reasons) and I would be very pleased with him as a candidate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I came across an interesting article from the <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/comment/columnists/tim_hames/article3142140.ece" rel="nofollow">Time of London</a> a few hours ago. This main point that I took from it focuses on the 38% likelihood that a GOP candidate will be in the White House in 2009.</p>
<p>The columnist, Tim Hames, suggests that because the 38% is an average of all GOP candidates against all Dems, the prospect of a GOP president rises when the nominee is more moderate (such as McCain or Giuliani) and declines for the more conservative candidates (Huckabee and Romney), and that Thompson has exactly a 38% chance (if he gets the nomination).</p>
<p>I&#8217;m hoping that the calculation actually includes Ron Paul with his zero percent chance of winning a general election, but since he also has a zero percent chance of getting the GOP nod, his prospects against Hillary probably aren&#8217;t included.</p>
<p>Anyway, while I am a Giuliani supporter, I think that McCain is, at worst, only slightly less electable (due more to his age than any policy reasons) and I would be very pleased with him as a candidate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-419105</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 03:58:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-419105</guid>
		<description>As much as I like Thompson&#039;s stands on the issues... I agree that he&#039;s probably not going anywhere.  His big problem (surprisingly for a professional actor) is in articulating his views.  He has strong convictions, and a good grasp of the issues, but he&#039;s just not inspiring when he speaks -- he doesn&#039;t sound passionate.

Sean -- I don&#039;t think it&#039;s at all that complicated or Machiavellian.  It&#039;s just that SC is his best shot to make a move, if Huckabee has imploded sufficiently by then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As much as I like Thompson&#8217;s stands on the issues&#8230; I agree that he&#8217;s probably not going anywhere.  His big problem (surprisingly for a professional actor) is in articulating his views.  He has strong convictions, and a good grasp of the issues, but he&#8217;s just not inspiring when he speaks &#8212; he doesn&#8217;t sound passionate.</p>
<p>Sean &#8212; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s at all that complicated or Machiavellian.  It&#8217;s just that SC is his best shot to make a move, if Huckabee has imploded sufficiently by then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-419033</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 01:07:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-419033</guid>
		<description>I think Thompson is waiting to see where the Romney vote goes. Since Thompson is the highest-polling conservative other than Romney, he probably has strong comeback hopes if he does well in SC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Thompson is waiting to see where the Romney vote goes. Since Thompson is the highest-polling conservative other than Romney, he probably has strong comeback hopes if he does well in SC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-419018</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jan 2008 00:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-419018</guid>
		<description>Fred Thompson is already finished, and he knows it. Right now, he&#039;s staying in the race as pennance to McCain for almost muscling him out of the race six months ago. Notice how he isn&#039;t campaigning in New Hampshire, where he would probably split the anti-Romney vote, but he IS campaigning in South Carolina, where he would likely split the southern favorite-son vote?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fred Thompson is already finished, and he knows it. Right now, he&#8217;s staying in the race as pennance to McCain for almost muscling him out of the race six months ago. Notice how he isn&#8217;t campaigning in New Hampshire, where he would probably split the anti-Romney vote, but he IS campaigning in South Carolina, where he would likely split the southern favorite-son vote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-418961</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:20:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-418961</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ve got a point - there&#039;s definitely a chance Thompson will stay in until Super Tuesday.  I&#039;m not trying to prematurely write him off, but I can&#039;t see any possible narrative that puts him back in the race.  He&#039;s running a distant third in South Carolina at the moment, or even fourth, as McCain as inching up in that state also...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ve got a point &#8211; there&#8217;s definitely a chance Thompson will stay in until Super Tuesday.  I&#8217;m not trying to prematurely write him off, but I can&#8217;t see any possible narrative that puts him back in the race.  He&#8217;s running a distant third in South Carolina at the moment, or even fourth, as McCain as inching up in that state also&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/comment-page-1/#comment-418960</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 22:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/01/06/and-then-came-new-hampshire/#comment-418960</guid>
		<description>&quot;(though I still say Fred Thompson is a good bet to go, and go quickly)&quot;

You keep saying this, and I keep scratching my head.  Thompson isn&#039;t expecting to place in New Hampshire, so why would he drop out when that happens?  Thompson&#039;s Do-or-Die state is South Carolina.  If he doesn&#039;t come in at least second there he&#039;s probably out.  If he does get at least second, he&#039;ll stick around another week until Super-Duper-Tuesday.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;(though I still say Fred Thompson is a good bet to go, and go quickly)&#8221;</p>
<p>You keep saying this, and I keep scratching my head.  Thompson isn&#8217;t expecting to place in New Hampshire, so why would he drop out when that happens?  Thompson&#8217;s Do-or-Die state is South Carolina.  If he doesn&#8217;t come in at least second there he&#8217;s probably out.  If he does get at least second, he&#8217;ll stick around another week until Super-Duper-Tuesday.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

