<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Guess I Should Weigh In At This Point</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447864</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 02:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447864</guid>
		<description>Obama&#039;s got a crazy advantage in money right now.  He raised $32 million in January to Clinton&#039;s $13 million.  Clinton had to infuse her campaign with $5 million of her own money, but Obama&#039;s raised $3 million &lt;i&gt;since last night&lt;/i&gt;.  I think the momentum is stunningly clear here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama&#8217;s got a crazy advantage in money right now.  He raised $32 million in January to Clinton&#8217;s $13 million.  Clinton had to infuse her campaign with $5 million of her own money, but Obama&#8217;s raised $3 million <i>since last night</i>.  I think the momentum is stunningly clear here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447835</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:39:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447835</guid>
		<description>Oh, I don&#039;t think Obama should bow out, to be sure...he&#039;s got a real shot...my gut says Hillary will carry the day, but she&#039;s in for a hell of a fight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I don&#8217;t think Obama should bow out, to be sure&#8230;he&#8217;s got a real shot&#8230;my gut says Hillary will carry the day, but she&#8217;s in for a hell of a fight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447830</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 01:29:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447830</guid>
		<description>Mine&#039;s Etienne!

I think Obama is the stronger candidate right now.  The Clinton&#039;s have been punching at him hard and he&#039;s taking it all and staying close.  Sure, he has to win eventually but he&#039;s not losing and his momentum is good.  I can imagine that his &quot;audacity of hope&quot; vision, his high-road(ish) campaign, and his overall enthusiasm, which seems sincere, will overtake Hillary&#039;s down-and-dirty, scrappy, and cynical approach.  Or, at least I hope so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mine&#8217;s Etienne!</p>
<p>I think Obama is the stronger candidate right now.  The Clinton&#8217;s have been punching at him hard and he&#8217;s taking it all and staying close.  Sure, he has to win eventually but he&#8217;s not losing and his momentum is good.  I can imagine that his &#8220;audacity of hope&#8221; vision, his high-road(ish) campaign, and his overall enthusiasm, which seems sincere, will overtake Hillary&#8217;s down-and-dirty, scrappy, and cynical approach.  Or, at least I hope so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sea-town</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447810</link>
		<dc:creator>Sea-town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2008 00:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447810</guid>
		<description>THIS WHOLE DAMN COUNTRY IS GOING TO HELL IN A VERSACE HANDBAG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THIS WHOLE DAMN COUNTRY IS GOING TO HELL IN A VERSACE HANDBAG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clint</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447660</link>
		<dc:creator>Clint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 20:33:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447660</guid>
		<description>If I&#039;m reading the numbers from RealClearPolitics correctly...

Hillary&#039;s advantage is 974 delegates to Obama&#039;s 906 -- but if you take out SuperDelegates, it&#039;s just 763 to Obama&#039;s 778 -- he&#039;s actually ahead.

I don&#039;t see any reason for Obama to bow out at this point -- he&#039;s got a number of states coming up where he&#039;ll likely do quite well, and he&#039;s still less well known than Hillary, so his numbers keep rising as he introduces himself to the voters.  He&#039;s still got a good chance to take the nomination, unless I&#039;m missing something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I&#8217;m reading the numbers from RealClearPolitics correctly&#8230;</p>
<p>Hillary&#8217;s advantage is 974 delegates to Obama&#8217;s 906 &#8212; but if you take out SuperDelegates, it&#8217;s just 763 to Obama&#8217;s 778 &#8212; he&#8217;s actually ahead.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see any reason for Obama to bow out at this point &#8212; he&#8217;s got a number of states coming up where he&#8217;ll likely do quite well, and he&#8217;s still less well known than Hillary, so his numbers keep rising as he introduces himself to the voters.  He&#8217;s still got a good chance to take the nomination, unless I&#8217;m missing something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447534</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:47:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447534</guid>
		<description>Bob:  I have to agree that the Dems are in a real pickle there, in Florida because of the history and in Michigan because Obama took himself off the ballot at the party&#039;s specific request.

If I was advising the Hillary campaign, I would suggest a &quot;do over&quot; -- ie: another Primary in both states, this time with the delegates going to the winner. Demographically both states should be fairly strong for her -- Florida has a large retiree and NY ex-pat community and Michigan voters are especially worried about the economy, an issue Obama has been slow to address. Plus, in both states the type of voters who supported Edwards (or would have if he was on the ballot, as in the case of Michigan) would probably have tilted to Hillary if he had been out of the race (IMO Edwards&#039;s southern white and economic downscale voters probably lean to Hillary and his yuppie MoveOn voters lean towards Obama, and Mich and Fla have much more of the first 2 demographics than the latter).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob:  I have to agree that the Dems are in a real pickle there, in Florida because of the history and in Michigan because Obama took himself off the ballot at the party&#8217;s specific request.</p>
<p>If I was advising the Hillary campaign, I would suggest a &#8220;do over&#8221; &#8212; ie: another Primary in both states, this time with the delegates going to the winner. Demographically both states should be fairly strong for her &#8212; Florida has a large retiree and NY ex-pat community and Michigan voters are especially worried about the economy, an issue Obama has been slow to address. Plus, in both states the type of voters who supported Edwards (or would have if he was on the ballot, as in the case of Michigan) would probably have tilted to Hillary if he had been out of the race (IMO Edwards&#8217;s southern white and economic downscale voters probably lean to Hillary and his yuppie MoveOn voters lean towards Obama, and Mich and Fla have much more of the first 2 demographics than the latter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447510</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 17:00:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447510</guid>
		<description>Nothing profound to add, except to note that headline writers are having a ball making puns on the Stones song (Goodbye Rudy Tuesday, Goodbye Super Tuesday, etc.) --</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nothing profound to add, except to note that headline writers are having a ball making puns on the Stones song (Goodbye Rudy Tuesday, Goodbye Super Tuesday, etc.) &#8211;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447458</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447458</guid>
		<description>One last point about the Dems, what about Michigan and Florida?  Is not there going to be heck to pay if the convention does not seat them?

Was not Florida the original &quot;count very vote and every vote counts&quot; state?  

I look forward to great fun at the convention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One last point about the Dems, what about Michigan and Florida?  Is not there going to be heck to pay if the convention does not seat them?</p>
<p>Was not Florida the original &#8220;count very vote and every vote counts&#8221; state?  </p>
<p>I look forward to great fun at the convention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447453</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447453</guid>
		<description>As for the GOP, McCain is the nominee.  He already has 60% +/- of the delegates needed and a majority of the ones decided.  Neither opponent can stop him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the GOP, McCain is the nominee.  He already has 60% +/- of the delegates needed and a majority of the ones decided.  Neither opponent can stop him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/comment-page-1/#comment-447450</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 15:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/02/06/i-guess-i-should-weigh-in-at-this-point/#comment-447450</guid>
		<description>Too soon to tell.  The Dem rules keep Obama in it since there is no winner take all.  California is a tough loss since it blunts the Obamania percerption.

I am not a Dem but I think this comment:


I hope they have the good sense to hand it to whoever’s ahead in pledged delegates at the end of the primaries.
&lt;blockquote&gt;

just rubs me wrong.  The concept of superdelegates is that the office holder&#039;s judgment is important and they should support the best candidate.&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too soon to tell.  The Dem rules keep Obama in it since there is no winner take all.  California is a tough loss since it blunts the Obamania percerption.</p>
<p>I am not a Dem but I think this comment:</p>
<p>I hope they have the good sense to hand it to whoever’s ahead in pledged delegates at the end of the primaries.</p>
<blockquote>
<p>just rubs me wrong.  The concept of superdelegates is that the office holder&#8217;s judgment is important and they should support the best candidate.</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

