<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gallup Daily Tracking Shows Some &#8220;Bitter&#8221; Aftertaste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2008/04/20/gallup-daily-tracking-some-show-bitter-aftertaste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/04/20/gallup-daily-tracking-some-show-bitter-aftertaste/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Apr 2012 09:00:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DBrooks</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/04/20/gallup-daily-tracking-some-show-bitter-aftertaste/comment-page-1/#comment-488522</link>
		<dc:creator>DBrooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Apr 2008 14:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/04/20/gallup-daily-tracking-some-show-bitter-aftertaste/#comment-488522</guid>
		<description>The powers-that-be in the structure of the Democratic Party can&#039;t be happy as this campaign continues to expose the lightness of being that is Obama, and erodes his support among moderates and white blue-collar Democrats.  I think Sean P is on to something.  &quot;They&quot; are looking for any excuse to shut this whole thing down, and a win by Obama in Indiana would be a chance for a select group of superdelegates to throw their support behind Obama in an attempt to drive Clinton out of the campaign.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The powers-that-be in the structure of the Democratic Party can&#8217;t be happy as this campaign continues to expose the lightness of being that is Obama, and erodes his support among moderates and white blue-collar Democrats.  I think Sean P is on to something.  &#8220;They&#8221; are looking for any excuse to shut this whole thing down, and a win by Obama in Indiana would be a chance for a select group of superdelegates to throw their support behind Obama in an attempt to drive Clinton out of the campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean P</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/04/20/gallup-daily-tracking-some-show-bitter-aftertaste/comment-page-1/#comment-488064</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean P</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 17:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/04/20/gallup-daily-tracking-some-show-bitter-aftertaste/#comment-488064</guid>
		<description>I agree with you analysis, I&#039;d only add that Hillary&#039;s campaign is broke and that Pennsylvania will probably be the last state she is able to compete with Obama on even a remotely equal footing. Unless she wins PA by a landslide (ie at least 15, and probably closer to 20 points) Obama&#039;s cash advantage will overwhelm her in Indiana, which she can&#039;t afford to lose. And -- this is pure speculation on my part -- but if Obama wins Indiana, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if at least 40-50 superdelegates immediately endorsed him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you analysis, I&#8217;d only add that Hillary&#8217;s campaign is broke and that Pennsylvania will probably be the last state she is able to compete with Obama on even a remotely equal footing. Unless she wins PA by a landslide (ie at least 15, and probably closer to 20 points) Obama&#8217;s cash advantage will overwhelm her in Indiana, which she can&#8217;t afford to lose. And &#8212; this is pure speculation on my part &#8212; but if Obama wins Indiana, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if at least 40-50 superdelegates immediately endorsed him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

