<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Palin Has Her Work Cut Out For Her Tonight</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 03:29:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-548395</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-548395</guid>
		<description>I never said that George Bush (or the current Republican Party) was a true conservative.  I just said that he isn’t a liberal.  

If you want to use Barry Goldwater as the epitome of true conservatism, then there is a wide gap between his philosophy and that of Bush and the GOP.  I think there is a lot to admire about true conservatism, but very little to admire about Bush and the current crop of Republicans.  (Excepting John McCain, who I do admire.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I never said that George Bush (or the current Republican Party) was a true conservative.  I just said that he isn’t a liberal.  </p>
<p>If you want to use Barry Goldwater as the epitome of true conservatism, then there is a wide gap between his philosophy and that of Bush and the GOP.  I think there is a lot to admire about true conservatism, but very little to admire about Bush and the current crop of Republicans.  (Excepting John McCain, who I do admire.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris J. Breisch</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-548385</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris J. Breisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 16:05:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-548385</guid>
		<description>One quick point:

&lt;blockquote&gt;I was not referring to Bush, but rather to the entire Republican Party. If Bush isn’t a conservative, as Chris argues and I’m willing to grant, then neither are the vast majority of Republicans. Certainly John McCain isn’t. Which makes me wonder what use there is in arguing about who’s conservative and who isn’t. Shorter version: if Bush isn’t really a conservative, then the Republican Party isn’t really the party of conservatives.

This, of course, is something I have been arguing for well over a year now - there is nothing even slightly conservative about warring for “freedom”, torturing human beings, or using the power of the state to spy on citizens - but it’s nice to know we’re all in agreement here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

For once, Ryan and I are in nearly perfect agreement here. I wouldn&#039;t phrase some of what he said quite that way, but that&#039;s a matter of degree, rather than a matter of disagreement. And while this information may be a surprise to people like Peter, it&#039;s no surprise to conservatives. Ryan&#039;s point is &lt;i&gt;exactly&lt;/i&gt; why Republicans got their hats handed to them in 2006. It wasn&#039;t that Democrats put really wonderful people on the ballot, or that the Democratic base was just rushing out to destroy Republicans, it was that conservatives had lost faith in the Republican party. I still haven&#039;t regained my faith. And I&#039;ve had many an unpleasant discussion with phone operatives for the RNC who have called me up asking for money.

I don&#039;t remember if I&#039;ve said this here before, so I apologize for repeating myself if I have. This year I am strongly considering voting for President and to re-elect my Governor (who has actually been a conservative), and leaving the rest of my ballot blank. There are no down-ballot Republicans that I know of that deserve my vote, especially my Congressman. I&#039;d lump my Republican Senator in there too, but lucky for him, he&#039;s not up for reelection this year.

And, for ages, the only reason I was even considering voting for John McCain (because I don&#039;t consider him a conservative) is because I don&#039;t want any more Ginsbergs on the Supreme Court. I&#039;m not foolish enough to believe that with the Senate he&#039;s going to face that he&#039;d nominate another Scalia or Roberts, but anybody he&#039;s going to put up there will have to be better than a Ginsberg (that&#039;s my opinion, of course, and I know that if you&#039;re on the left, you&#039;d feel exactly the opposite...you&#039;re entitled).

Fortunately, Sarah Palin IS a true conservative, or pretty close. There are things I disagree with her on, but far fewer than most Republicans. I don&#039;t know how she feels about illegal immigration, but I suspect that her views are closer to mine than to John McCain&#039;s.

Ok, that&#039;s all I have to say on this thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One quick point:</p>
<blockquote><p>I was not referring to Bush, but rather to the entire Republican Party. If Bush isn’t a conservative, as Chris argues and I’m willing to grant, then neither are the vast majority of Republicans. Certainly John McCain isn’t. Which makes me wonder what use there is in arguing about who’s conservative and who isn’t. Shorter version: if Bush isn’t really a conservative, then the Republican Party isn’t really the party of conservatives.</p>
<p>This, of course, is something I have been arguing for well over a year now &#8211; there is nothing even slightly conservative about warring for “freedom”, torturing human beings, or using the power of the state to spy on citizens &#8211; but it’s nice to know we’re all in agreement here.</p></blockquote>
<p>For once, Ryan and I are in nearly perfect agreement here. I wouldn&#8217;t phrase some of what he said quite that way, but that&#8217;s a matter of degree, rather than a matter of disagreement. And while this information may be a surprise to people like Peter, it&#8217;s no surprise to conservatives. Ryan&#8217;s point is <i>exactly</i> why Republicans got their hats handed to them in 2006. It wasn&#8217;t that Democrats put really wonderful people on the ballot, or that the Democratic base was just rushing out to destroy Republicans, it was that conservatives had lost faith in the Republican party. I still haven&#8217;t regained my faith. And I&#8217;ve had many an unpleasant discussion with phone operatives for the RNC who have called me up asking for money.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t remember if I&#8217;ve said this here before, so I apologize for repeating myself if I have. This year I am strongly considering voting for President and to re-elect my Governor (who has actually been a conservative), and leaving the rest of my ballot blank. There are no down-ballot Republicans that I know of that deserve my vote, especially my Congressman. I&#8217;d lump my Republican Senator in there too, but lucky for him, he&#8217;s not up for reelection this year.</p>
<p>And, for ages, the only reason I was even considering voting for John McCain (because I don&#8217;t consider him a conservative) is because I don&#8217;t want any more Ginsbergs on the Supreme Court. I&#8217;m not foolish enough to believe that with the Senate he&#8217;s going to face that he&#8217;d nominate another Scalia or Roberts, but anybody he&#8217;s going to put up there will have to be better than a Ginsberg (that&#8217;s my opinion, of course, and I know that if you&#8217;re on the left, you&#8217;d feel exactly the opposite&#8230;you&#8217;re entitled).</p>
<p>Fortunately, Sarah Palin IS a true conservative, or pretty close. There are things I disagree with her on, but far fewer than most Republicans. I don&#8217;t know how she feels about illegal immigration, but I suspect that her views are closer to mine than to John McCain&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Ok, that&#8217;s all I have to say on this thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stas peterson</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-548220</link>
		<dc:creator>stas peterson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 06:28:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-548220</guid>
		<description>What is a Chicago style &quot;Community Organizer&quot;?  It&#039; a guy who practices getting out the vote for the  machine.   That means registering the illegal aliens; that means registering the felons; that means registering the cemetery headstones.

Obama was a party hack, developing and then delivering the votes for the machine; and simply doing the nitty-gritty work in the vinyards of Chicago machine politics...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is a Chicago style &#8220;Community Organizer&#8221;?  It&#8217; a guy who practices getting out the vote for the  machine.   That means registering the illegal aliens; that means registering the felons; that means registering the cemetery headstones.</p>
<p>Obama was a party hack, developing and then delivering the votes for the machine; and simply doing the nitty-gritty work in the vinyards of Chicago machine politics&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-548011</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 22:26:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-548011</guid>
		<description>One quick point - I complained about lack of substance at the Democratic convention, but then Obama laid out an agenda pretty well in his speech.  Since there has been no substance or agenda to speak of at the Republican convention, I expect the same from McCain...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One quick point &#8211; I complained about lack of substance at the Democratic convention, but then Obama laid out an agenda pretty well in his speech.  Since there has been no substance or agenda to speak of at the Republican convention, I expect the same from McCain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-547962</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 20:26:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-547962</guid>
		<description>TMS: the operative clause is

&quot;we’re supposed to believe that eight years in the White House (with control of Congress for six and the Supreme Court for roughly forever) aren’t enough for us to establish what the Republican Party really wants to do with the levers of government.&quot;

I was not referring to Bush, but rather to the entire Republican Party.  If Bush isn&#039;t a conservative, as Chris argues and I&#039;m willing to grant, then neither are the vast majority of Republicans.  Certainly John McCain isn&#039;t.  Which makes me wonder what use there is in arguing about who&#039;s conservative and who isn&#039;t.  Shorter version: if Bush isn&#039;t really a conservative, then the Republican Party isn&#039;t really the party of conservatives.

This, of course, is something I have been arguing for well over a year now - there is nothing even slightly conservative about warring for &quot;freedom&quot;, torturing human beings, or using the power of the state to spy on citizens - but it&#039;s nice to know we&#039;re all in agreement here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TMS: the operative clause is</p>
<p>&#8220;we’re supposed to believe that eight years in the White House (with control of Congress for six and the Supreme Court for roughly forever) aren’t enough for us to establish what the Republican Party really wants to do with the levers of government.&#8221;</p>
<p>I was not referring to Bush, but rather to the entire Republican Party.  If Bush isn&#8217;t a conservative, as Chris argues and I&#8217;m willing to grant, then neither are the vast majority of Republicans.  Certainly John McCain isn&#8217;t.  Which makes me wonder what use there is in arguing about who&#8217;s conservative and who isn&#8217;t.  Shorter version: if Bush isn&#8217;t really a conservative, then the Republican Party isn&#8217;t really the party of conservatives.</p>
<p>This, of course, is something I have been arguing for well over a year now &#8211; there is nothing even slightly conservative about warring for &#8220;freedom&#8221;, torturing human beings, or using the power of the state to spy on citizens &#8211; but it&#8217;s nice to know we&#8217;re all in agreement here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-547930</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:36:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-547930</guid>
		<description>1)	George Bush centrist or left of center?  I guess his Supreme Court picks, enthusiasm for secret rendition, tax cuts for upper income homes, disregard for the environment, and using lobbyists to write regulations are the tip-off.
2)	Giuliani did not specify who “they” are, and the “they” in the preceding paragraph referred to McCain and Palin.  In a speech supporting the Republican ticket, I think it’s reasonable to think that “they” referred to the Democratic opposition.
3)	How many people does a fighter pilot lead?
4)	Fine.
5)	On July 28, McCain voted against the most recent energy bill, which supported alternative energy sources.  I guess he got it within the last five weeks.
6)	Agreed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)	George Bush centrist or left of center?  I guess his Supreme Court picks, enthusiasm for secret rendition, tax cuts for upper income homes, disregard for the environment, and using lobbyists to write regulations are the tip-off.<br />
2)	Giuliani did not specify who “they” are, and the “they” in the preceding paragraph referred to McCain and Palin.  In a speech supporting the Republican ticket, I think it’s reasonable to think that “they” referred to the Democratic opposition.<br />
3)	How many people does a fighter pilot lead?<br />
4)	Fine.<br />
5)	On July 28, McCain voted against the most recent energy bill, which supported alternative energy sources.  I guess he got it within the last five weeks.<br />
6)	Agreed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: too many steves</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-547922</link>
		<dc:creator>too many steves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:23:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-547922</guid>
		<description>You&#039;ld be hard pressed to convince me that the Supreme Court is &quot;controlled&quot; by the President, or anyone for that matter.  Filled by the President?  Sure, but vetted and approved by the Congress too.

Doesn&#039;t the Congress get some of the credit/blame for the current state of affairs - however it is you view them?  You can&#039;t let the last two year&#039;s Democrat controlled Congress off the hook while simultaneously blaming everything on the Republican controlled Congress of 2000 - 2006.  Well, I guess you can but you would be wrong to do so.

Man!  The more you guys talk the less I like any of these characters!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ld be hard pressed to convince me that the Supreme Court is &#8220;controlled&#8221; by the President, or anyone for that matter.  Filled by the President?  Sure, but vetted and approved by the Congress too.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t the Congress get some of the credit/blame for the current state of affairs &#8211; however it is you view them?  You can&#8217;t let the last two year&#8217;s Democrat controlled Congress off the hook while simultaneously blaming everything on the Republican controlled Congress of 2000 &#8211; 2006.  Well, I guess you can but you would be wrong to do so.</p>
<p>Man!  The more you guys talk the less I like any of these characters!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris J. Breisch</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-547920</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris J. Breisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-547920</guid>
		<description>1) He&#039;s a centrist, and in many cases, a left-of-centrist, Keith.
2) Stop moving the goalposts.  You said Rudy&#039;s &quot;how dare they statement&quot; was absurd since no one had done that. I pointed out numerous examples where they had. You then claimed he was talking about Democrats, when he clearly wasn&#039;t.  Peter, you&#039;ve lost on this point. You have no reasonable comeback other than to admit that I&#039;m right.
3) Guess you missed the part where he said &quot;he&#039;s never run a military unit. he&#039;s never had to lead people in crisis.&quot;
4) Then we just disagree.
5) I believe he said that it&#039;s one thing to have a certain set of energy views when gas is $1/gallon, but that $4/gallon gasoline alters your views. This is a big deal for me. I&#039;ve been on the &quot;energy independence&quot; bandwagon much longer than ANYONE in Washington that I can see, and it seems apparent that McCain finally &quot;gets it&quot;.  Obama just as clearly, doesn&#039;t.
6) Thank God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) He&#8217;s a centrist, and in many cases, a left-of-centrist, Keith.<br />
2) Stop moving the goalposts.  You said Rudy&#8217;s &#8220;how dare they statement&#8221; was absurd since no one had done that. I pointed out numerous examples where they had. You then claimed he was talking about Democrats, when he clearly wasn&#8217;t.  Peter, you&#8217;ve lost on this point. You have no reasonable comeback other than to admit that I&#8217;m right.<br />
3) Guess you missed the part where he said &#8220;he&#8217;s never run a military unit. he&#8217;s never had to lead people in crisis.&#8221;<br />
4) Then we just disagree.<br />
5) I believe he said that it&#8217;s one thing to have a certain set of energy views when gas is $1/gallon, but that $4/gallon gasoline alters your views. This is a big deal for me. I&#8217;ve been on the &#8220;energy independence&#8221; bandwagon much longer than ANYONE in Washington that I can see, and it seems apparent that McCain finally &#8220;gets it&#8221;.  Obama just as clearly, doesn&#8217;t.<br />
6) Thank God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peter</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-547914</link>
		<dc:creator>peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 19:11:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-547914</guid>
		<description>1)	If George Bush is a liberal, I’m Keith Richards.
2)	Who is McCain/Palin running against, the Democrats or the media?
3)	Not sure what your point is.  Giuliani bashed Obama because, as a Senator, he never “ran” anything.  McCain, as a Senator, never ran anything either.  If running something is sine qua non for being elected President, why doesn’t it apply to McCain?
4)	Not at all.
5)	What’s the point of campaigning for them if you vote against them?  Palin said that a McCain administration will push for alternative energy – why would anyone believe that when he voted against them in Congress?
6)	He bucked his party on immigration until he recanted.
7)	Me too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1)	If George Bush is a liberal, I’m Keith Richards.<br />
2)	Who is McCain/Palin running against, the Democrats or the media?<br />
3)	Not sure what your point is.  Giuliani bashed Obama because, as a Senator, he never “ran” anything.  McCain, as a Senator, never ran anything either.  If running something is sine qua non for being elected President, why doesn’t it apply to McCain?<br />
4)	Not at all.<br />
5)	What’s the point of campaigning for them if you vote against them?  Palin said that a McCain administration will push for alternative energy – why would anyone believe that when he voted against them in Congress?<br />
6)	He bucked his party on immigration until he recanted.<br />
7)	Me too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris J. Breisch</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/comment-page-1/#comment-547903</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris J. Breisch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 18:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/09/03/palin-has-her-work-cut-out-for-her-tonight/#comment-547903</guid>
		<description>Ryan,
Unfortunately, I have to agree with you on what Republican control over the White House and Congress has brought us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan,<br />
Unfortunately, I have to agree with you on what Republican control over the White House and Congress has brought us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
