<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It Only Took A Month&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595739</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595739</guid>
		<description>Actually, that&#039;s not fair.  I&#039;m retracting it.  Democrats are pretty equally responsible, much to my dismay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that&#8217;s not fair.  I&#8217;m retracting it.  Democrats are pretty equally responsible, much to my dismay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595729</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 20:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595729</guid>
		<description>Chambliss accused Cleland of &quot;breaking his oath to protect and defend the Constitution.&quot;  How should I interpret that?

Also, Democrats don&#039;t &quot;whine&quot; about their patriotism being questioned.  The people who aren&#039;t responsible for the torture and murder of thousands of human beings aren&#039;t the ones with patriotism problems.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chambliss accused Cleland of &#8220;breaking his oath to protect and defend the Constitution.&#8221;  How should I interpret that?</p>
<p>Also, Democrats don&#8217;t &#8220;whine&#8221; about their patriotism being questioned.  The people who aren&#8217;t responsible for the torture and murder of thousands of human beings aren&#8217;t the ones with patriotism problems.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595483</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:44:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595483</guid>
		<description>Just so we&#039;re clear &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKFYpd0q9nE&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; is the ad, right?

There wasn&#039;t a different one with Cleland&#039;s face morphing into bin-Laden or something like that, was there?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just so we&#8217;re clear <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tKFYpd0q9nE" rel="nofollow">this</a> is the ad, right?</p>
<p>There wasn&#8217;t a different one with Cleland&#8217;s face morphing into bin-Laden or something like that, was there?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595480</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:32:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595480</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Questioning the patriotism of a man who left limbs on the battlefield is not the moral equivalent of a spelling error.&lt;/i&gt;

My point was one of proportion -- a concept that is apparently foreign to you -- not morals.

But in any case, it&#039;s a moot point since the ad was questioning Cleland&#039;s judgement in voting against the Homeland Security bill.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Questioning the patriotism of a man who left limbs on the battlefield is not the moral equivalent of a spelling error.</i></p>
<p>My point was one of proportion &#8212; a concept that is apparently foreign to you &#8212; not morals.</p>
<p>But in any case, it&#8217;s a moot point since the ad was questioning Cleland&#8217;s judgement in voting against the Homeland Security bill.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595477</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:27:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595477</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Aaron, I’ll come to you for all of those pesky questions where reality yells too loud for me to hear what I really want to believe.&lt;/i&gt;

Believe reality over what you want to believe? Why start now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Aaron, I’ll come to you for all of those pesky questions where reality yells too loud for me to hear what I really want to believe.</i></p>
<p>Believe reality over what you want to believe? Why start now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595475</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 06:25:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595475</guid>
		<description>Cleland voted against the Homeland Security bill times because he was beholden to big labor at the expense of national security.

The Chambliss campaign pointed this out and the Democrats -- as they always do when their poor judgement with regard to national security issues is put on display -- whined about their patriotism being questioned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cleland voted against the Homeland Security bill times because he was beholden to big labor at the expense of national security.</p>
<p>The Chambliss campaign pointed this out and the Democrats &#8212; as they always do when their poor judgement with regard to national security issues is put on display &#8212; whined about their patriotism being questioned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fargus</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595455</link>
		<dc:creator>Fargus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 03:50:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595455</guid>
		<description>Yup, Chambliss did nothing but criticize Cleland&#039;s voting record.  Aaron, I&#039;ll come to you for all of those pesky questions where reality yells too loud for me to hear what I really want to believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yup, Chambliss did nothing but criticize Cleland&#8217;s voting record.  Aaron, I&#8217;ll come to you for all of those pesky questions where reality yells too loud for me to hear what I really want to believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 22:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595413</guid>
		<description>Questioning the patriotism of a man who left limbs on the battlefield is not the moral equivalent of a spelling error.

Additionally, I assume Shakespeare would at least have the decency to apologize for said spelling error.  And he probably also wouldn&#039;t link to halfwit hacks who insist that the spelling error never occurred in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Questioning the patriotism of a man who left limbs on the battlefield is not the moral equivalent of a spelling error.</p>
<p>Additionally, I assume Shakespeare would at least have the decency to apologize for said spelling error.  And he probably also wouldn&#8217;t link to halfwit hacks who insist that the spelling error never occurred in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikebdot</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595380</link>
		<dc:creator>mikebdot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 20:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595380</guid>
		<description>Why does the right hate Bill Clinton, besides the Clenis thing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the right hate Bill Clinton, besides the Clenis thing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/comment-page-1/#comment-595377</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 19:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2008/12/02/it-only-took-a-month/#comment-595377</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122831457057475705.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;A Win for Civility&lt;/a&gt;.

Without mentioning the KKK&#039;s position on race, what&#039;s wrong with them?
How about their anti-Catholicism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia?

In any case, the Klan&#039;s &lt;i&gt;raison d&#039;etre&lt;/i&gt; was the promotion of hate. Take the hate out of the Klan and you don&#039;t have anything left.

Even if one were to accept the fallacious assertion that Saxby Chambliss&#039;s criticism of Max Cleland&#039;s voting record was the equivalent of questioning his patriotism, take that brief instance out of his career, and there&#039;s still plenty in his career to criticize or admire. He actually has a fairly bipartisan voting record.

Saying that someone is a despicable human being in general based upon thirty seconds is like saying that someone is a bad writer over one spelling error. Even Shakespeare couldn&#039;t meet that bar.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122831457057475705.html" rel="nofollow">A Win for Civility</a>.</p>
<p>Without mentioning the KKK&#8217;s position on race, what&#8217;s wrong with them?<br />
How about their anti-Catholicism, anti-Semitism and xenophobia?</p>
<p>In any case, the Klan&#8217;s <i>raison d&#8217;etre</i> was the promotion of hate. Take the hate out of the Klan and you don&#8217;t have anything left.</p>
<p>Even if one were to accept the fallacious assertion that Saxby Chambliss&#8217;s criticism of Max Cleland&#8217;s voting record was the equivalent of questioning his patriotism, take that brief instance out of his career, and there&#8217;s still plenty in his career to criticize or admire. He actually has a fairly bipartisan voting record.</p>
<p>Saying that someone is a despicable human being in general based upon thirty seconds is like saying that someone is a bad writer over one spelling error. Even Shakespeare couldn&#8217;t meet that bar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

