<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oh, My&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://informedspeculation.com/2009/01/05/oh-my/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2009/01/05/oh-my/</link>
	<description>Refunds Cheerfully Given To All Who Disagree</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 06:53:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2009/01/05/oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-610154</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 14:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2009/01/05/oh-my/#comment-610154</guid>
		<description>Agree with you Mark....Glad Texas won, of course, but despite Mack Brown&#039;s proclamations (which is all part of the job), Texas really didn&#039;t make a case for being the best team in the country. Certainly a top 5, but they just squeaked it out over Ohio State, and had some ugly goings in the first half.  Utah seems to have the best argument among the also-rans.  I hope Tech can finish high in the polls. They had a great year by any measure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with you Mark&#8230;.Glad Texas won, of course, but despite Mack Brown&#8217;s proclamations (which is all part of the job), Texas really didn&#8217;t make a case for being the best team in the country. Certainly a top 5, but they just squeaked it out over Ohio State, and had some ugly goings in the first half.  Utah seems to have the best argument among the also-rans.  I hope Tech can finish high in the polls. They had a great year by any measure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://informedspeculation.com/2009/01/05/oh-my/comment-page-1/#comment-610034</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 05:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decision08.net/2009/01/05/oh-my/#comment-610034</guid>
		<description>Time to divide the title into three pieces.  USC has already claimed one, as has Utah.  There&#039;s one left, so who wants it?  Florida?  Oklahoma?  I&#039;d say UT didn&#039;t exactly stake much of a claim on it tonight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Time to divide the title into three pieces.  USC has already claimed one, as has Utah.  There&#8217;s one left, so who wants it?  Florida?  Oklahoma?  I&#8217;d say UT didn&#8217;t exactly stake much of a claim on it tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

